THURGOOD (a review of a play by George Stevens, Jr.

Post Reply
Dave (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 6386
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 6:06 pm

Posting Rank

THURGOOD (a review of a play by George Stevens, Jr.

Post by Dave (imported) »

A one man play about the life an times of Thurgood Marshal, first AFrican American to be Solicitor General and then Supreme Court Justice of the USA.

The Pittsburgh Public Theater does a play once a year that leaves me without expectations or (let's put this in plain terms) any idea of what the play is about. It's short, 90 minutes in one act, and surprisingly entertaining. It isn't a polemic or a boring history but a nicely lively and fun look at Thurgood Marshall. A nice afternoon or evening.

So if it comes to your area, go see it.

Their next play is going to be Clyborne Park by Bruce Norris and this play intrigues me (I know a little about its themes and situations).
transward (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1075
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:17 am

Posting Rank

Re: THURGOOD (a review of a play by George Stevens, Jr.

Post by transward (imported) »

I have been singing the praise of Thurgood Marshall for years. He is one of the most underapperciated great Americans in the history of our country. I mean no disrespect for Martin Luther King, but I have long felt that we should really be celebrating Thurgood Marshall day. King was the Drum Major out in front of the Civil Rights movement when it came to its greatest fruition, but Marshall was the one that did an immense amount of the heavy lifting that started the modern movement back in the depths of the Great Depression. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurgood_Marshall

Marshall set up a private practice in Baltimore in 1936. That year, he began working with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in Baltimore.

He won his first major civil rights case, Murray v. Pearson, 169 Md. 478 (1936). This was the first challenge of the "separate but equal" doctrine that was part of the Plessy v. Ferguson decision. His co-counsel on the case, Charles Hamilton Houston, developed the strategy. Marshall represented Donald Gaines Murray, a black Amherst College graduate with excellent credentials, who was denied admission to the University of Maryland Law School because of its segregation policy. Black students in Maryland wanting to study law had to accept one of three options, attend: Morgan College, the Princess Anne Academy, or out-of-state black institutions.

In 1935, Thurgood Marshall argued the case for Murray, showing that neither of the in-state institutions offered a law school and that such schools were entirely unequal in quality to the University of Maryland. Marshall and Houston expected to lose and intended to appeal to the federal courts. The Maryland Court of Appeals ruled against the state of Maryland and its Attorney General, who represented the University of Maryland, stating, "Compliance with the Constitution cannot be deferred at the will of the state. Whatever system is adopted for legal education must furnish equality of treatment now." While it was a moral victory, the state court's ruling had no authority outside of Maryland.

Chief Counsel for the NAACP

At the age of 32, Marshall won his first U.S. Supreme Court case, Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227 (1940). That same year, he was appointed Chief Counsel for the NAACP. He argued many other civil rights cases before the Supreme Court, most of them successfully, including Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944); Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948); Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950); and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950). His most famous case as a lawyer was Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), the case in which the Supreme Court ruled that "separate but equal" public education, as established by Plessy v. Ferguson, was not applicable to public education because it could never be truly equal. In total, Marshall won 29 out of the 32 cases he argued before the Supreme Court. .........On June 13, 1967, President Johnson nominated Marshall to the Supreme Court following the retirement of Justice Tom C. Clark, saying that this was "the right thing to do, the right time to do it, the right man and the right place." Marshall was confirmed as an Associate Justice by a Senate vote of 69–11 on August 30, 1967.[15] He was the 96th person to hold the position, and the first African American. President Johnson confidently predicted to one biographer, Doris Kearns Goodwin, that a lot of black baby boys would be named "Thurgood" in honor of this choice.[16]

Marshall served on the Court for the next twenty-four years, compiling a liberal record that included strong support for Constitutional protection of individual rights, especially the rights of criminal suspects against the government. His most frequent ally on the Court (the pair rarely voted at odds) was Justice William Brennan, who consistently joined him in supporting abortion rights and opposing the death penalty. Brennan and Marshall concluded in Furman v. Georgia that the death penalty was, in all circumstances, unconstitutional, and never accepted the legitimacy of Gregg v. Georgia, which ruled four years later that the death penalty was constitutional in some circumstances. Thereafter, Brennan or Marshall dissented from every denial of certiorari in a capital case and from every decision upholding a sentence of death.[citation needed] In 1987, Marshall gave a controversial speech on the occasion of the bicentennial celebrations of the Constitution of the United States.[17] Marshall stated,

"the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and major social transformations to attain the system of constitutional government and its respect for the freedoms and individual rights, we hold as fundamental today."

In conclusion Marshall stated

"Some may more quietly commemorate the suffering, struggle, and sacrifice that has triumphed over much of what was wrong with the original document, and observe the anniversary with hopes not realized and promises not fulfilled. I plan to celebrate the bicentennial of the Constitution as a living document, including the Bill of Rights and the other amendments protecting individual freedoms and human rights."[18]

I believe he still has one of the best winning percentages in arguing cases before the Supreme Court.

Transward
Dave (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 6386
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 6:06 pm

Posting Rank

Re: THURGOOD (a review of a play by George Stevens, Jr.

Post by Dave (imported) »

Murray v. Pearson is mentioned quite a lot in the play and Lyndon Johnson provides much of the comedy.

The mention of most court cases is so dry that people run, eyes glaze, and interest not only wanes but gallops away. The play avoids that dreadful fate.

This play starts with Plessy v Ferguson and ends with Marshall's retirement speech to the Supreme Court. I ahd forgotten how opposed he was to the Death Penalty. It's a shame the current SC believes otherwise.
Post Reply

Return to “Jokes, Links, Media & More”