vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Paolo
Articles: 0
Posts: 9709
Joined: Wed May 16, 2001 8:53 am

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by Paolo »

Andrew, you are the only AOL user who seems to not have infinite problems with the site. That's why we love you so.πŸ‘‰
Andrew (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 6:05 am

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by Andrew (imported) »

Paolo wrote: Mon Dec 08, 2003 4:10 pm Andrew, you are the only AOL user who seems to not have infinite problems with the site. That's why we love you so.πŸ‘‰

I wonder if that is because I am still on AOL 5.0, and most have converted to AOL 9.0?

πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡ πŸ™‡
Mac (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1492
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 10:53 am

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by Mac (imported) »

Paolo wrote: Mon Dec 08, 2003 4:10 pm Andrew, you are the only AOL user who seems to not have infinite problems with the site. That's why we love you so.πŸ‘‰
I have been using AOL 9.0 for about a month now. Haven't had any site problems with either 8.0 or 9.0 except for the horizontal scroll with the current v-bulletin version at first. The screen is ok now and the scroll bars are gone from some, but not all, of the screens. I am using 1280 x 1024 resolution with the lavender screen.
A-1 (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 4:44 pm

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by A-1 (imported) »

🚬 🚬

This seems to take a long time to load.

Is anybody else having this trouble, also?

🚬 A-1 🚬
Robby (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 9:22 pm

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by Robby (imported) »

A-1 (imported) wrote: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:53 pm 🚬 🚬

This seems to take a long time to load.

Is anybody else having this trouble, also?

🚬 A-1 🚬

Not for me A-1... not sure what is causing your slowness. 🚬

Robby
Paolo
Articles: 0
Posts: 9709
Joined: Wed May 16, 2001 8:53 am

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by Paolo »

A-1 must be on dial-up.πŸ’‘

Me, I get pissy when my MP3's don't finish downloading AS I'm playing them.

🚬
Mac (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1492
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 10:53 am

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by Mac (imported) »

Mac (imported) wrote: Mon Dec 08, 2003 8:01 pm I have been using AOL 9.0 for about a month now. Haven't had any site problems with either 8.0 or 9.0 except for the horizontal scroll with the current v-bulletin version at first. The screen is ok now and the scroll bars are gone from some, but not all, of the screens. I am using 1280 x 1024 resolution with the lavender screen.
I tried the new "Paolo Gray" screen. It eliminated the horizontal scroll bars and provided a larger screen image. Would it be possible to have this screen resolution in the other screen colors (Purple and Light Blue)?
radar (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 11:10 am

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by radar (imported) »

Being on dial-up is almost worse than having no Internet access at all. At least, if one has no access, there are other things he can do-limited though they may be for some of us Internet junkies-but, on dial-up, my blood pressure would be going through the roof as I screamed at the monitor while waiting for pages to load. Could never go back to 56k. Does anyone else remember when 14.4k was hot stuff?

I remember when a 1200 baud modem was major hot stuff. The place I worked at the time bought one for $800 and thought it was a bargain. And it was only 10 years ago that most of us were limited to 2400 baud connections to the online services like Compuserve and Prodigy.

Oh, how I love my cable modem!
Slammr (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1643
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 12:21 pm

Posting Rank

Re: vBulletin 3 "Gamma"

Post by Slammr (imported) »

radar (imported) wrote: Sun Dec 14, 2003 4:06 pm I remember when a 1200 baud modem was major hot stuff. The place I worked at the time bought one for $800 and thought it was a bargain. And it was only 10 years ago that most of us were limited to 2400 baud connections to the online services like Compuserve and Prodigy.

Oh, how I love my cable modem!

Ah-ten years ago. I had a 486 dx33 Mhz comp and a 14.4k modem. I had Prodigy and paid $5-6 an hour to connect to AOL. I had another ip which connected me to the Internet, which was all text, except for the binary files which were available on the newsgroups. I spent over $200 a month to play Doom via modem over long distance telephone connections. Definitely not the "good old days." I, too, love my cable internet connection. I could never go back to dial up.
Post Reply

Return to β€œEunuch Central”