Riverwind (imported) wrote: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:09 am Is this a bad time to say History repeats itself?
River
Not at all. In fact, "history repeats itself" in rather entertaining ways in the case of the way they are telling this story. It is both true and humorous at the same time.
While the Roman historians are brief in the accounts of the slave rebellion, this story tries to fill in the gaps with all sorts of characters who plot, scheme and blather about the glory of Rome while acting like evil bastards. This is also the first time that Romans -- both citizens and slaves -- are shown in their baser and highly sexualized existences.
So the broad outline of history has to repeat, after all Spartacus didn't conquer Rome but did defeat Glaber and went on to fight some more. Think Seasons three and four.