getting it while driving at 85...
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:39 pm
>>WOW!
>>This isn't the first time that I heard of this.
>>Do not do this at home.
>>
On the Beltway, a claim of drunken sex at 85 mph
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... ml?hpid=z4
Lawsuits after car crashes are beyond common. But in the Fairfax County courthouse, a lawsuit about a crash on the Beltway last year is dropping a few jaws as it makes the rounds and heads toward trial next week. Among the latest allegations in the lawsuit pending in Fairfax County Circuit Court:
Paragraph 10. At the time of the collision, Defendant was going 85 miles per hour.
Paragraph 12. At the time of the collision, Defendant was having sex with a female.
Paragraph13. At the time of the collision, Defendant was driving admittedly drunk.
Paragraph 14. At the time of the accident, Defendant was partially or totally in the backseat of the car.
Wait, WHA? 85 miles per hour? The backseat? And what happened to paragraph 11?
Records show the defendant, from Woodbridge, was convicted in Fairfax district court of drunken driving near Telegraph Road in May 2010. But now he denies he was driving. (What?) He was coming from his 21st birthday party in Baltimore, court records state. The woman involved has been dismissed from the case. There was someone ELSE in the car too, and HE denies driving as well.
The defendants lawyer, Frank Prior, said there was no statement by anyone that they were driving on the Beltway having sex and no facts on it. The plaintiff, a 28-year-old cab driver, is seeking $75,000 in damages and is represented by Douglas R. Stevens, who declined to comment beyond his court filings.
But Stevens sought punitive damages against the defendant and the friend, arguing in a pleading that having sex at 85 miles per hour while drunk on a freeway is willful and wanton negligence. A Fairfax judge threw out the punitive damages claim.
The case is set for trial next week.
By Tom Jackman | 10:27 PM ET, 06/15/2011
>>This isn't the first time that I heard of this.
>>Do not do this at home.
>>
On the Beltway, a claim of drunken sex at 85 mph
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... ml?hpid=z4
Lawsuits after car crashes are beyond common. But in the Fairfax County courthouse, a lawsuit about a crash on the Beltway last year is dropping a few jaws as it makes the rounds and heads toward trial next week. Among the latest allegations in the lawsuit pending in Fairfax County Circuit Court:
Paragraph 10. At the time of the collision, Defendant was going 85 miles per hour.
Paragraph 12. At the time of the collision, Defendant was having sex with a female.
Paragraph13. At the time of the collision, Defendant was driving admittedly drunk.
Paragraph 14. At the time of the accident, Defendant was partially or totally in the backseat of the car.
Wait, WHA? 85 miles per hour? The backseat? And what happened to paragraph 11?
Records show the defendant, from Woodbridge, was convicted in Fairfax district court of drunken driving near Telegraph Road in May 2010. But now he denies he was driving. (What?) He was coming from his 21st birthday party in Baltimore, court records state. The woman involved has been dismissed from the case. There was someone ELSE in the car too, and HE denies driving as well.
The defendants lawyer, Frank Prior, said there was no statement by anyone that they were driving on the Beltway having sex and no facts on it. The plaintiff, a 28-year-old cab driver, is seeking $75,000 in damages and is represented by Douglas R. Stevens, who declined to comment beyond his court filings.
But Stevens sought punitive damages against the defendant and the friend, arguing in a pleading that having sex at 85 miles per hour while drunk on a freeway is willful and wanton negligence. A Fairfax judge threw out the punitive damages claim.
The case is set for trial next week.
By Tom Jackman | 10:27 PM ET, 06/15/2011