Page 2 of 2

Re: Glansectomys are so much better than being intact

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:51 am
by JeffEunuch (imported)
Riven (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:10 am I'm really interested to hear that. I always presumed that, without the glans, a penis would lack the nerve endings necessary for proper stimulation, making orgasm difficult or even impossible to achieve.

If you google 'partial penectomy,' you'll find the results on the ability to orgasm by guys that've lost their glans or even most of their cock. I recall one website reporting the resuts for dozens of guys (most or all for medical reasons). Avg remaining length was 4cm (1.5") and most reported little impact on ability to orgasm. Only total loss may affect ability to orgasm. Main issue seems to be psychological impact rather than the physiology of the loss.

Re: Glansectomys are so much better than being intact

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:45 pm
by markdf (imported)
Who was that guy, can you post a link?

A bit late ... but ask and you shall receive.

The event itself

ModBlog: "That changed the course of the interview". (http://modblog.bmezine.com/2006/03/19/t ... interview/)

The aftermath

ModBlog: "Healed penectomy with testicles in place". (http://modblog.bmezine.com/2006/06/07/h ... -in-place/)

ModBlog and BMEZine -- every castration fetishist should be very familiar with those sites.