• Conservatives & Homosexuality

Posted: **Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:19 pm**

Why Can't Conservatives Stop Thinking About Homosexuality?

Someone put together a list of top ten page views on Wikipedia and top ten page views on Conservapedia (the answer to Wikipedia made up by conservatives who think that Wikipedia is liberally biased). You're not going to believe the top ten most popular pages on Conservapedia.

Wikipedia is "The Free Encyclopedia." What's on the mind of Wikipedias readers? Here are the top ten most viewed pages on Wikipedia:

1 - Main Page [30,090,900]

2 - Wiki [904,800]

3 - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows [413,400]

4 - Naruto [401,400]

5 - Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock [396,000]

6 - United States [330,000]

7 - Wikipedia [329,400]

8 - Deaths in 2007 [321,300]

9 - Heroes (TV series) [307,500]

10 - Transformers (film) [303,600]

Conservapedia is "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia." What's on the mind of its readers? Here are the top ten most viewed pages on Conservapedia:

1 - Main Page? [1,906,729]

2 - Homosexuality? [1,572,713]

3 - Homosexuality and Hepatitis? [517,086]

4 - Homosexuality and Promiscuity? [420,687]

5 - Gay Bowel Syndrome? [389,052]

6 - Homosexuality and Parasites? [388,123]

7 - Homosexuality and Domestic Violence? [365,888]

8 - Homosexuality and Gonorrhea? [331,553]

9 - Homosexuality and Mental Health? [291,179]

10 - Homosexuality and Syphilis? [265,322

Compiled by Mark Frauenfelder

http://www.boingboing.net/2007/11/21/to ... iewed.html

Posted: **Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:04 pm**

JesusA (imported) wrote: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:19 pm Why Can't Conservatives Stop Thinking About Homosexuality?

Someone put together a list of top ten page views on Wikipedia and top ten page views on Conservapedia (the answer to Wikipedia made up by conservatives who think that Wikipedia is liberally biased). You're not going to believe the top ten most popular pages on Conservapedia.

Wikipedia is "The Free Encyclopedia." What's on the mind of Wikipedias readers? Here are the top ten most viewed pages on Wikipedia:

1 - Main Page [30,090,900]

2 - Wiki [904,800]

3 - Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows [413,400]

4 - Naruto [401,400]

5 - Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock [396,000]

6 - United States [330,000]

7 - Wikipedia [329,400]

8 - Deaths in 2007 [321,300]

9 - Heroes (TV series) [307,500]

10 - Transformers (film) [303,600]

Conservapedia is "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia." What's on the mind of its readers? Here are the top ten most viewed pages on Conservapedia:

1 - Main Page? [1,906,729]

2 - Homosexuality? [1,572,713]

3 - Homosexuality and Hepatitis? [517,086]

4 - Homosexuality and Promiscuity? [420,687]

5 - Gay Bowel Syndrome? [389,052]

6 - Homosexuality and Parasites? [388,123]

7 - Homosexuality and Domestic Violence? [365,888]

8 - Homosexuality and Gonorrhea? [331,553]

9 - Homosexuality and Mental Health? [291,179]

10 - Homosexuality and Syphilis? [265,322

Compiled by Mark Frauenfelder

http://www.boingboing.net/2007/11/21/to ... iewed.html

Always knew they were a bunch of closet cases...

Posted: **Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:19 pm**

Liberals have it half wrong and conservatives have the other half wrong. I sure would enjoy a party where the goal was one law.

Don't block Traffic

And the basis would be for everyone to mind their own biz....

Where is THAT party? I want to join and send money to further that cause...

btw - Homosexual bowel movements?!?!

Posted: **Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:26 pm**

Gay Bowel Syndrome?

That was one of the symptoms of AIDS before doctors knew what AIDS was or what caused AIDS.

Posted: **Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:52 pm**

Dave (imported) wrote: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:26 pm That was one of the symptoms of AIDS before doctors knew what AIDS was or what caused AIDS.

Ahhh. but why that interests a large number of people?!?! Sheesh!

Posted: **Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:01 pm**

mrt (imported) wrote: Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:52 pm Ahhh. but why that interests a large number of people?!?! Sheesh!

They tend to live in and seek the safety of the past. Ergo they research antiquated information from the past to satisfy their current life style and way of living. Perhaps, they are also stupid.

Posted: **Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:42 pm**

I took a look at this page:

"2 - Homosexuality? [1,572,713]" and it just amazes me the amount misinformation there. I am especially intrigued by all the bible quotes using the word "homosexual"... a word which did not even exist as such in biblical times.

Hmmmm.... I wonder if Trent Lott reads Conservapedia?

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:58 pm**

Conservatives are a scary bunch. Anyone who wants to execute people and deny medical care to poor children yet sees the life of a mindless fetus as sacred and holy... well, you can decide for yourself what kind of person has that kind of system of values.

I'm surprised that "conservapedia" is still going. Wikipedia rocks because it has sooo much information. Starting a completely new wiki lacking much of that awesome data, just so that you can get rid of any facts that you find inconvenient; well, it's a profound waste of time.

Experts are still going to put all their information into wikipedia, and if jackass conservatives want to transfer any of it into their sad little wiki, they'll have to check every single page to make sure that it doesn't say anything about global warming, embryology, evolution, geology and archaeology, anthropology, or any of the million other topics that make fat drug addicts like Rush Limbaugh cry themselves to sleep every night.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:51 pm**

It's funny how the fundamentalists pound on the few obscure references about homosexuality in the bible. It's funny how their pews are packed with huge fat asses that forget that GLUTONY is one of the 7 Deadly sins! It's funny how they like to quote their prophet Jesus, but only when it supports what they believe. I may be wrong, but I believe that Jesus also said, "let he who is without sin, cast the first stone". There are issues that are so important to deal with and they want to waste time in the legislature and elsewhere worrying about homosexuality. Give me a break!!! If they don't like cock sucking, they can just stop sucking cock!

Posted: **Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:46 pm**

IT's simple.

It is because Homosexuals have sex more often than they do.

Even if they had the Harems of King David, I can see the concubines and wives trying to con somebody into taking 'their turn'.

After all, who would want to fuck these fuckers anyway?

...certainly no woman in her right mind, unless that is all that she could get...

...even then, one time with these would probably be enough to make the women wish that she had been more picky...

Conservatives & Homosexuality

Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality

Re: Conservatives & Homosexuality