Pros and Cons of Prostheses
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:40 pm
The usual prosthetic replacements you hear about are for arms or legs, but prosthetic testes must be the most difficult to detect as prosthetic devices, of all prosthetics. Put objects of the right size and shape in the sac, and anyone looking at the scrotum would think it was normal, assuming that there was no prominent scar that would indicate an orchiectomy had been performed. I can remember reading some time ago that a number of different materials--glass, aluminum, rubber, and polished jade among them, have been used at different times as the raw materials for prosthetic testicles. Plastic, either by itself or with something else inserted to increase the weight, must be the usual material for prosthetics of that type at the present time.
I can't remember reading any posts on these message boards, in which anybody indicated that he had had prosthetic testes implanted. However, there must be a lot of men who have orchiectomy for prostate cancer, who do have the implants inserted. And certainly there must be a lot of individuals who have elective orchiectomies, who consider having implants put in.
So, the question I would have regarding prosthetic implants to replace the male gonads, is whether anybody who accesses the message boards has had implants, and whether they seem satisfactory. It would also be interesting to know what the effect of having implants is, both on the individual who has them put into the sac, and on other people. Would having the prosthetics, even though they were nonfunctional, give somebody confidence he wouldn't otherwise have? And, perhaps, would people who knew that someone had had orchiectomy, but could also see that he had the implanted prosthetics, be more likely to see him as a "man who had an operation" rather than as a eunuch? After all, most eunuchs who had their surgery after puberty, don't appear to be any different than other men, other than the absence of testes--I would guess that those taking hormone supplements, don't even have significantly smaller phalluses than most men.
From an esthetic perspective, according to some of the posts I have read, the empty sac often looks loose and shriveled, while prostheses would fill it out and give it a smoother look. In particular, I would think that, if an individual has had one testicle removed, the prosthesis would make the scrotum look somewhat more symmetrical than if only one gonad were in it.
Of course, there are some persons who had orchiectomy, in part, because they didn't like the looks of the scrotum or testes, and my impression is, that most Archive members like the "smooth" crotch appearance. A substantial number of women also say that, if they are erotically interested in a man, then the scrotum has a certain attractiveness--but, otherwise, they consider it ugly. I recall one girl saying the scrotum looked like a "popout" (a hernia).
With a lot of current research going on, directed toward developing methods of growing replacement organs, perhaps it will be possible at some indeterminate time in the future, to get replacement testes--maybe even ones which produce, at least to a near approximation, the amount of testosterone that the individual having the implant wants. For a lot of people, I suppose that would create another reason for uncertainty--should they get new testes; or would that simply create another ambiguous situation, like the one which originally led to their having an orchiectomy?
To my knowledge, there is nothing which could be described as a prosthetic penis, though I have read about penises being surgically constructed, both for those who have lost their original phalluses, and for female to male transsexuals. I would guess that stores which carry adult sexual implements, sell a lot of dildos, but those have a somewhat different purpose than prostheses.
I can't remember reading any posts on these message boards, in which anybody indicated that he had had prosthetic testes implanted. However, there must be a lot of men who have orchiectomy for prostate cancer, who do have the implants inserted. And certainly there must be a lot of individuals who have elective orchiectomies, who consider having implants put in.
So, the question I would have regarding prosthetic implants to replace the male gonads, is whether anybody who accesses the message boards has had implants, and whether they seem satisfactory. It would also be interesting to know what the effect of having implants is, both on the individual who has them put into the sac, and on other people. Would having the prosthetics, even though they were nonfunctional, give somebody confidence he wouldn't otherwise have? And, perhaps, would people who knew that someone had had orchiectomy, but could also see that he had the implanted prosthetics, be more likely to see him as a "man who had an operation" rather than as a eunuch? After all, most eunuchs who had their surgery after puberty, don't appear to be any different than other men, other than the absence of testes--I would guess that those taking hormone supplements, don't even have significantly smaller phalluses than most men.
From an esthetic perspective, according to some of the posts I have read, the empty sac often looks loose and shriveled, while prostheses would fill it out and give it a smoother look. In particular, I would think that, if an individual has had one testicle removed, the prosthesis would make the scrotum look somewhat more symmetrical than if only one gonad were in it.
Of course, there are some persons who had orchiectomy, in part, because they didn't like the looks of the scrotum or testes, and my impression is, that most Archive members like the "smooth" crotch appearance. A substantial number of women also say that, if they are erotically interested in a man, then the scrotum has a certain attractiveness--but, otherwise, they consider it ugly. I recall one girl saying the scrotum looked like a "popout" (a hernia).
With a lot of current research going on, directed toward developing methods of growing replacement organs, perhaps it will be possible at some indeterminate time in the future, to get replacement testes--maybe even ones which produce, at least to a near approximation, the amount of testosterone that the individual having the implant wants. For a lot of people, I suppose that would create another reason for uncertainty--should they get new testes; or would that simply create another ambiguous situation, like the one which originally led to their having an orchiectomy?
To my knowledge, there is nothing which could be described as a prosthetic penis, though I have read about penises being surgically constructed, both for those who have lost their original phalluses, and for female to male transsexuals. I would guess that stores which carry adult sexual implements, sell a lot of dildos, but those have a somewhat different purpose than prostheses.