Studlover (imported) wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:41 pm
Problem solved! Lowering the legal age to 16 then 16 years olds are legal and and adult couldn't be classified as a pedophile.
Now, as for as blaming it on a Catholic Priest that shouldn't be a problem. One's former Priest or just any Priest would be fine! Doesn't have to be a Catholic Priest. Any clergy member will do!
Because of the scandal of the Roman Catholic Priest in the last 3 years, America will buy into it, realizing that Priest turn hetrosexual male teenagers into homosexual teenagers, send the the Priests/Clergy to prison for life, and the Republicans remain in power.
Yep, the Devil made me do it!
Wasn't that easy?
Studlover
When I was fourteen I was fondled by my Algebra teacher on several occasions. He liked fourteen year old boys and would take us to the movies and other places. He particularly liked one of my friends that had a ten inch dick. He did much more with him, than with me. Once, while camping, and they were skinny dipping, the teacher tackled him, inserting his dick between his legs, getting off by by holding the boy's legs against his dick. He never penetrated any of us or sucked any one's cock, as far as I know.
I wasn't traumatized by the experience. I don't believe it made any difference in my sexuality. I don't know that anyone even disliked the guy because of it. He was one of the most popular teachers in the school. Hell, having someone older pay some attention to me was worth letting him rub my cock some. My father never paid any attention to me.
My sexual preferences -- although I wasn't completely cognizant of them then -- were pretty well already set. Looking back, I think they were set long before puberty. The teacher didn't make me queer or make me want to have sex with boys. I was never turned on by him, and -- as far as I can remember -- never got an erection when he rubbed my dick, which was probably why he didn't do it to me that often. I suppose, if I'd been turned on by it, he would have taken me to more movies.
I'm not saying it's all right for adult men to play around with fourteen year-old boys. I'm just saying it's not as big a deal as Foley and others imply it is. We boys talked about it among ourselves. None of us were traumatized by the experience. "He's queer. He likes boys. So what," was the attitude. Of course, the world was different then. None of us -- I guaren-God Damn-tee you -- would have felt we had been abused had a good looking woman teacher had sex with us. Fuck -- we were fourteen years-old. We would have been in Heaven, had we been fucked by an older woman. The world has become a little crazy about sex since.
None of us -- as far as I know -- felt guilty or blamed ourselves because he wanted to play with our dicks. That was the way he was. That was him, not us. I'm not saying that some boys seduced by priests or others haven't been traumatized by such an experience, but I doubt Foley was. I imagine the priest picked Foley, recognizing that he would be receptive to the attention he paid him, just as the teacher picked the boys he did, boys hungry for attention.
One the Classmates board for my high school, there were many comments about this teacher, saying he was the best teacher they ever had, comments by both males and females. I was tempted to say, "Hey, you idiots, he was a pedophile," but what good would that do? He's probably dead by now, or old enough that he's no threat to anyone. I'm certainly not going to blame any of my shortcomings on him.
There are differences here between what I and my friends experienced and what others have experienced. I always felt I could have said, "No," and that would have ended it. I went to the movie -- the drive-in -- knowing I might get my dick rubbed. I could have turned down the invitation. Having him take me to the movie and having him talk to me was worth letting him rub my dick -- fair trade I thought at the time. Even looking back on it, I think it was a fair trade.
I could have avoided the teacher. That's a big difference. I was in control. I can understand that it would be different for someone that had no control over the situation. That's rape, altogether different.
From the description the priest gave, his encounter with Foley didn't sound like rape. It was an abuse of power -- abuse of authority -- but not rape. Sounds like Foley knew he was going to have his dick played with and wanted it to happen.
How's that for taking this thread off course? But, Studlover made me do it.