Page 1 of 1

Copyright (another for Andrew)

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:27 am
by Studlover (imported)
COPYRIGHT

When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write, if the

copy is right. If however, your copy falls over, you must right your copy.

If you write religious services you write rite, and have the right to copyright

the rite you write.

Very conservative people write right copy, and have the right to copyright the

right copy they write. A right wing cleric would write right rite, and has the

right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has

the job of making the right rite copy

right before the copyright can be right.

Should Thom Wright decide to write right rite, then Wright would write right

rite, which Wright has the right to copyright. Duplicating that rite would

copy Wright right rite, and violate copyright, which Wright would have the

right to right.

Right?

Re: Copyright (another for Andrew)

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:23 am
by Riverwind (imported)
RIGHT! as right can be

Re: Copyright (another for Andrew)

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 10:25 am
by Riverwind (imported)
Then again; that, that is, is, that, that is not, is not, am I right?

Re: Copyright (another for Andrew)

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:17 pm
by Dave (imported)
In the immortal words of the poet -

Is is not not is