Here it is, finally.

Mitt Romney explains his views clearly, so everyone can understand him And his positions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQx3qWL43Qo

No. This video does not belong in the politics section. Just watch it. You won't regret it.

WOW, that was really something, even :kittygray(Rupert) was impressed . He said nothing yes its true he said nothing you could say he was just off his mouth. He is for what he is against, and he believes in but

what I herd gave me an I was thinking of MOI, NO really, and I realized I wanted to get up on my and

scream.

I do hope that before this election is over he actually tells me something, anything, crumbs even.

River

I really had a good laugh when I saw this video. At first I thought I was watching a real Romney ad. It really is like what I've been seeing from the guy. Say one thing, then quickly say the opposite. Never take a firm stance.

I am in real awe of the editing skills it took to put this video together. It all came across so natural, and unforced. It got me really excited to watch the debates that are coming from Obama and Romney. I really want to see if Romney can answer a direct question or not.

This is all just so darn entertaining to me.

Greatest reality show, EVER!

It's about as clear as what he has really said.

I've yet to hear clear and concise views he has on anything. It's as if his whole campaign can be summed up as, "I'm not Obama..." (but I am part of the party that simply says no to everything hoping to regain power).

--LT

Who was it, who was walking along the Colorado River in Boulder Canyon, stumbled on a boulder and shouted out, "Dam it!"

And the canyon was dammed.

And the dam was named for Hoo?

Remember H. V Kaltenborn's radio blooper, announcing the name of the U.S. President, "Hoobert Heever"?

For myself, Mitt is perfectly clear and concise about his views; his views are absolute proof of chaos theory's utilitarian value.

Ever meet someone whose personality is made of pure reaction-formation adaptations to near-total depersonalization?

And yet, how often does a politician start out saying, "I don't believe..."

I suppose I could tell what I don't believe and do so for a googolplex-squared years without ever saying a whit about anything I do believe.

But then, in all fairness, I have never found it necessary to find ways to adapt to being depersonalized; perhaps because I never permitted anyone to depersonalize me.

A couple interesting books about the sort of stuff that may be the basis of Mitt Romney's personality structure, both books by Fritz Redl and David Wineman, "Children Who Hate," The Free Press, 1951, and "Controls From Within," The Free Press, 1952. Those two books were also published in a single book, "Techniques for the Treatment of the Aggressive Child," Free Press, 1957.