So who has seen the newest Harry Potter movie, the first half of which the second half we need to wait until next summer to see?

My son watched it on line somehow and said it split just where you would expect it to.

Me I am going to wait until part 2 comes out then watch part 1 on DVD then go see part 2 at the theater. Hell I have waited this long, whats another 6 months, the actor kids are now in there late 20's and have teens of there own. I did decide to reread book 7 again so I dusted, YES dusted it off, its that old and started it again. I am not to far into it and already its like reading if for the first time, again.

River

uh River, dear boy,

Daniel Radcliffe was born on 23 July 1989.

That makes him 21 years old and HP7 was completed over a year ago.

I took G3 to see it. We very much enjoyed it. It stuck to the book much better than all of the other films. The breakpoint was a good one, too. Overall, it was very well done and what was cut out wasn't all that important - such as Harry disguising himself as a little Weasley cousin at the wedding via a potion.

It's a shame the other 6 weren't so well done.

Dave (imported) wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:36 pm uh River, dear boy,

Daniel Radcliffe was born on 23 July 1989.

That makes him 21 years old and HP7 was completed over a year ago.

My point was that it has taken to long to release the film by at least a year, at least they decided to release the second part next summer instead of next December.

River

Paolo wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:45 pm I took G3 to see it. We very much enjoyed it. It stuck to the book much better than all of the other films. The breakpoint was a good one, too. Overall, it was very well done and what was cut out wasn't all that important - such as Harry disguising himself as a little Weasley cousin at the wedding via a potion.

It's a shame the other 6 weren't so well done.

I am glad to hear that, the first two followed the books then it took a left turn, I am glad they finally put it back on track.

I will still wait to see it, I think.

River

There are *7* Harry Potter films?! Wow! I've not seen one, or read the books.

I was hoping Harry would reprise his equus role in this film. But he only got

down to his underpants.

Sweetpickle (imported) wrote: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:33 pm I was hoping Harry would reprise his equus role in this film. But he only got

down to his underpants.

Actually, there is a shot of him in pink bra out there and panties and all that hairy chest and stomach presenting a contrasting view.

If you look real hard in the videos on the internet, someone filmed the nude scene in EQUUS and although he is young and cute, the angle of the camera from below the stage looking up into the full moon winking and fruit salad (plums and banana) dangling is never, I repeat never any man's best angle.

He's cute in his own fuzzy butt way.

And he was such a cute 11 year old.

Oh well, they all grow up.

At least I have a 2 year old now, thanks to G1.

Maybe he'll be talented, and we can exploit him?

twaddler (imported) wrote: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:27 pm There are *7* Harry Potter films?! Wow! I've not seen one, or read the books.

You have herd of the Harry Potter (books and movies) Yes? NO?

River