Re: Things we should know but dont
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:45 pm
Thought I had seen a picture of Roman scissors. I have to suspect that, since it's tough to cut fabric without them, scossors may well have been invented several times, something which also seems to be the case with paper.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scissors
What Leonardo might have done, is invent left-handed scissors, which have to be considered a boon to anybody who is left handed.
While there aren't clocks in the slot machine or table games areas of casinos, a number of casinos in Las Vegas (Palace Station, The Rio, The Orleans) do have clocks in the sports books so bettors can get their bets in before betting closes for an event.
Leonardo did work for years on the "Mona Lisa." Leonardo was an experimenter, and the pigment used on the lips has faded out, so it's hard to tell where the edges of the lips actually are. A number of early copies of the painting exist, and some art critics think that one or two of these can give you a better idea of what the painting originally looked like, than the actual painting in the Louvre does. The original painting was wider than it was high, with a column on either side of the woman's figure. The picture was cut down to its present size by a Frenchman.
Not criticisms, just other viewpoints. An interesting post.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scissors
What Leonardo might have done, is invent left-handed scissors, which have to be considered a boon to anybody who is left handed.
While there aren't clocks in the slot machine or table games areas of casinos, a number of casinos in Las Vegas (Palace Station, The Rio, The Orleans) do have clocks in the sports books so bettors can get their bets in before betting closes for an event.
Leonardo did work for years on the "Mona Lisa." Leonardo was an experimenter, and the pigment used on the lips has faded out, so it's hard to tell where the edges of the lips actually are. A number of early copies of the painting exist, and some art critics think that one or two of these can give you a better idea of what the painting originally looked like, than the actual painting in the Louvre does. The original painting was wider than it was high, with a column on either side of the woman's figure. The picture was cut down to its present size by a Frenchman.
Not criticisms, just other viewpoints. An interesting post.