Page 3 of 3

Re: Being stalked is NOT fun.

Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:41 pm
by chilliwilli (imported)
Kangan (imported) wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:48 pm Good post.

You must live in a big bad city.... I have no way to provide for security since my rural boondocks property has a 1.5-mile perimeter. I do have some high-tech video cameras hidden in strategic locations with a digital recorder. I can't stop someone from getting onto my property, but I will have a record of them and their vehicle icense plate if they do.

Kangan-

The cities great! I'm the only male nurse in a row of four nurse owned homes and I got stuck with the fire hydrant out front! So I have to mow around that. And people are understanding I guess. But being a bit of a nun helps...I guess... 🚬

the darling domestic

chilli-

Re: Being stalked is NOT fun.

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:24 pm
by Beau Geste (imported)
Here's a thought experiment which comes to mind. Suppose a woman is being stalked as Yoli describes, and she mounts an elastrator on the hood of her vehicle, where the hood ornament (e.g. Nike or a jungle cat) is normally located. Or she could hang something like a burdizzo from her mirror, or do something else which suggested an interest in castration. The stalker would, presumably, notice the thing and find out what its significance was. (I don't think any woman would actually do this sort of thing, but this is a thought experiment.)

Then, in most cases, would his arousal be stimulated or deflated? I suspect that, typically, the arousal would be heightened--because excitement, not any real emotional attachment, is what the stalking is about.

According to what I have read, stalkers (like O.J. Simpson) sometimes go to considerable lengths, expending a lot of time and effort, to carry out their stalking activities. How could it be worth it, especially considering the possibility that the stalker is, in most jurisdictions, committing a crime, and could be arrested for what he does?