To introduce a little bit of accuracy here: orgasm is not needed to impregnate, ejaculation is, the two are separate occurences that usually are simultaneous, but not always. --FLO--

Ver wll said uncle flo,as if any precum were to enter the womans vagina or even to go on the genital area this would be enough to cause pregnancy.

Uncle Flo (imported) wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:21 am To introduce a little bit of accuracy here: orgasm is not needed to impregnate, ejaculation is, the two are separate occurences that usually are simultaneous, but not always. --FLO--

That's what I meant and you know it. AAANYWAy.. WE NEED TO SQUIRT CUM in order to have more children ("live forever"), women don't.. Okay.

chemcast scot (imported) wrote: Sat Oct 16, 2010 12:39 pm Ver wll said uncle flo,as if any precum were to enter the womans vagina or even to go on the genital area this would be enough to cause pregnancy.

Actually, I don't think that is true. Precum is secreted by special glans and is believed to lubricate and change the acidity. Sperm is rare in this fluid.

A-1 (imported) wrote: Fri Jun 29, 2007 5:46 pm In case you are wondering what this thread is all about, CLICK HERE. (http://www.consumptionjunction.com/cont ... 1&page=511)

It is pretty GROSS, so if you have a weak stomach, don't look...

...I wonder where they get this stuff...:shakemitk

All I get is an ad for porn. Hardly that gross.

Transward

transward (imported) wrote: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:47 am All I get is an ad for porn. Hardly that gross.

Transward

Same here.

It's an old thread, the link has probably changed.

That site used to be free. A few years ago it changed to require registration and a possibly a fee to view content.

They specialize in all kinds of gross things to display, including a man that tied a string to a boy's foreskin, stretched it out over a log on the ground. The man then placed a knife on the foreskin then hit it, either with his fist or a heavy hand-held object. There was another man behind the child that grabbed the boy's wounded genitals with his dirty hands in what appeared to be an attempt to stem the blood loss.

Where adults get off cutting children's genitals whether in a clean hospital or a dirty location is a complete mystery to me. Any and all modifications, especially the permanent type should only be the decision of the person being modified.

Wasn't that some Africans first just stretching the boy's penis (to get that large black cock when older?.. hehe!) then cutting off his foreskin? I don't think that was penectomy, wtf?? I think I saw that video somewhere, if it's the same video you're talking about.

Yes, maybe.

However, I think this thread began with that type of circumcision and it was done wrong. They screwed up big time and took the glans also.

I've also heard reports that this happens even in clean hospitals performed by well trained surgeons and occasionally at a bris.