Riverwind (imported) wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:35 am Funny you should bring him up.

I play WOW (world of warcraft) and I have a hunter who just got a new pet, its a snake, I named him Donald Trump.

River

How humiliating for the snake. --FLO--

Riverwind (imported) wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:35 am Funny you should bring him up.

I play WOW (world of warcraft) and I have a hunter who just got a new pet, its a snake, I named him Donald Trump.

River

I didn't know snakes could have comb-overs or as they are called in parts of Europe - barcodes.

Slammr (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:07 pm The world might be watching, but that will not include me. I don't give a shit. Maybe, when Charles becomes King, the UK will have the good sense to do away with the monarchy. Who would want that dork as a king? But then, Elizabeth might outlive him.

Now that Elizabeth achieved her goal of being the longest serving English monarch, don't you think that she might be trying to prevent Charles from becomming king?

Back to the wedding: It is just a big waste of money that could be used for more important things.

Mac (imported) wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:46 am Now that Elizabeth achieved her goal of being the longest serving English monarch, don't you think that she might be trying to prevent Charles from becoming king?

Back to the wedding: It is just a big waste of money that could be used for more important things.

The bigger question is do we even care about Charles and His Mother?

and, You mean the wedding money could be used for tax cuts and government subsidies to the rich and privileged?

But my darling MAC, Wills and Kate are the rich and privileged Royalty. They are the ones that get the subsidies and the privileges...

They have people walking the path of the bride and groom from the royal residence to Westminster Abbey checking that tulips and flowers that have lost their bloom are replaced with fresh blooming flowers. London will be gorgeous for the wedding.

>>A man in Britain got Wills and Katy tattooed on his two front teeth...

>>I posted this and then read the article (that's ass backwards, I know) but I never heard of “gnasher tats” ... I'm too old for this stuff!!!

http://windsorknot.today.com/_news/2011 ... d-on-teeth

By Rina Raphael

Is there something stuck on your teeth? Oh no, that’s just a tattoo of Prince William and Kate Middleton.

One man has officially won The Windsor Knot’s royal wedding mania title by willingly paying £1,000 to submit to six hours in a dentist’s chair in order to have the famous duo emblazoned on his choppers. (The prize? Ridicule!)

British plumber Barmy Baz Franks, 29, got a dentist to use ultrafine brushes and stencils to paint images of the smiling royals. The temporary ivory art – known as “gnasher tats” – will last roughly three months, depending on how much Barmy Baz Franks brushes. “I’ve done some unusual dental cosmetics in my time, but this was certainly one of the strangest,” said the dentist, Dr. Neil Gerrard, in an interview with Small World News Service.

Mac (imported) wrote: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:46 am Back to the wedding: It is just a big waste of money that could be used for more important things.

Have you thought about the money the wedding will be generating? I am sure hotels will be full. Money generated for the travel industry. Shopkeepers will be selling memorabilia and raking in the money. All in all I think it will be good for business. I know I bought a new hat for the event.

Spend money to make money.

They are clearly imposters. Just look at their teeth.

The news reports that there are at least 8000 reporters on the scene in London

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp ... =47022&c=1

Royal wedding media coverage round-up: How journalists plan to cover the big day

26 April 2011, By Elsa Buchanan

More than 8,000 journalists, photographers and technical staff are arriving in London this week to cover the royal wedding, based at temporary media villages outside Buckingham Palace and Green Park.

Here we look at how some of the biggest broadcasters, news agencies and national newspapers will cover the event.

The BBC

A BBC spokesperson confirmed it was sending more than 850 staff to cover the wedding. Around 550 staff will help produce coverage for BBC1, and a further 300 for Radio 2, Radio 4, Radio 5 Live, BBC News 24 and Newsnight.

...

ITV

Around 300 staff will cover the event for ITV. Coverage starts on its breakfast show Daybreak with Adrian Chiles and Christine Bleakley, and other hosts include Kate Garraway in Buckleberry, Lucy Verasamy from Westminster Abbey and Grainne Seoige live from Pontefract.

...

CNN

CNN is sending around 400 staff to cover the event including 50 journalists and producers.

...

Sky News

A Sky News spokeswoman confirmed it has allocated 160 staff to cover the wedding,

...

Press Association

PA plans to have up to 100 editorial staff covering the wedding including 40 wire reporters and 30 photographers and video journalists...

Guardian News & Media

A dozen journalists will be reporting on the wedding alongside a mix of staff and agency photographers.

Photographer Martin Parr will be covering wedding parties being held outside the capital and the Guardian will also be producing a free supplement for the paper on 30 April.

The website will feature live blogging and videos.

I myself am having a wedding day party,

Peanut butter on a Ritz.

River