COPYRIGHT
When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write, if the
copy is right. If however, your copy falls over, you must right your copy.
If you write religious services you write rite, and have the right to copyright
the rite you write.
Very conservative people write right copy, and have the right to copyright the
right copy they write. A right wing cleric would write right rite, and has the
right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has
the job of making the right rite copy
right before the copyright can be right.
Should Thom Wright decide to write right rite, then Wright would write right
rite, which Wright has the right to copyright. Duplicating that rite would
copy Wright right rite, and violate copyright, which Wright would have the
right to right.
Right?
Copyright (another for Andrew)
-
Studlover (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 7:49 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
Riverwind (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 7558
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 1:58 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
Riverwind (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 7558
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 1:58 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Copyright (another for Andrew)
Then again; that, that is, is, that, that is not, is not, am I right?
-
Dave (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 6386
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2001 6:06 pm
-
Posting Rank