Happy Birthday Paolo!
Re: Happy Birthday Paolo!
Awesome! Happy Birthday! Hope you got some good food, and lots of time with your favorite kids to share it!
Re: Happy Birthday Paolo!
Thanks, folks.
We had a bit of freezing rain today, so I stayed home with a cheesecake and a box of sugar free ice cream.
We had a bit of freezing rain today, so I stayed home with a cheesecake and a box of sugar free ice cream.
-
Wolf-Pup (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:38 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Happy Birthday Paolo!
Happy Birthday Darth Paolo, may we destroy a planet in thine honor?



:redbounce
:redbounce
-
Sweetpickle (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:37 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
Uncle Flo (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2512
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 6:54 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
transward (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:17 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Happy Birthday Paolo!
My sympathy at this sad moment in your life. Here on your very own day, our President announces he would not be building you a new Death Star, a truly cowardly decision. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... -star-you/
Obama: Sorry, no Death Star for you
Mr. Shawcross cited several reasons for the administrations decision to reject the Death Star proposal, including the administrations longstanding policy that it does not support blowing up planets.
He also cited the daunting $850 quadrillion price tag, as estimated by business students at Lehigh University.
Were working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it, he noted.
And Mr. Shawcross said that research conducted in Hollywood revealed unexpected defensive vulnerabilities with Death Star technology, which might not make its construction cost-effective.
Why should we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship? he asked.
Again my sympathy.
Transward
Obama: Sorry, no Death Star for you
Mr. Shawcross cited several reasons for the administrations decision to reject the Death Star proposal, including the administrations longstanding policy that it does not support blowing up planets.
He also cited the daunting $850 quadrillion price tag, as estimated by business students at Lehigh University.
Were working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it, he noted.
And Mr. Shawcross said that research conducted in Hollywood revealed unexpected defensive vulnerabilities with Death Star technology, which might not make its construction cost-effective.
Why should we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship? he asked.
Again my sympathy.
Transward
-
Quillman (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2001 12:19 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
Ernie of Maine (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:19 pm
-
Posting Rank