bobover3 (imported) wrote: Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:41 am Just come back from seeing it. Didn't think I'd like it because of my loyalty to the Swedish original, but I was wrong. I actually think Hollywood's Lisbeth is more effective, and more affecting, than the Swedish.
My one gripe - the sound. I saw it in a theater I visit often, so I don't think it was the theater that made it so often difficult to hear. Had I not already known the story, large parts of the film would have been incomprehensible. I can't imagine why, in a big budget Hollywood movie, they didn't use sound technology that could capture all that was said. I'll see it again, and hope it's better understood on a second listening.
Other than that, a fine film. The 2'40" flew by.
P.S. There are many small differences between the Swedish and American versions. Would someone who's read the book comment on which was the more accurate adaptation?
I had problems hearing the movie, too. I wear hearing aids, but with them, I can usually hear the movie OK. I was at a different theater from the one I usually attend, but upon reading your post, I'm thinking there was something wrong with the sound track. I couldn't understand much of the conversation.
Having read the books, the Swedish film version is closer to the book.