Page 1 of 9

Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:30 am
by Mininuts (imported)
I have read a few replies to articles on here where alot of men would be quite happy to not have balls as long as penis still functioned ok . Is this common amongst all men or just ones with a castration interest?

I dont like balls personally and think they look very ugly and spoil the nice appearance of the penis and would love to be rid of mine.

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:33 am
by Bagoas (imported)
NO ! The vast majority of normal men regard their balls as their most precious possession. Rightly so, for not only do they make it possible to reproduce, but they provide expensive testosterone free of charge.

Make the slightest threatening gesture toward a man's balls, and what does he do ? He puts both hands over them to protect them. They are the "family jewels" and there is nothing which most normal men fear more than their loss.

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:35 am
by kristoff
Bagoas (imported) wrote: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:33 am NO ! The vast majority of normal men regard their balls as their most precious possession. Rightly so, for not only do they make it possible to reproduce, but they provide expensive testosterone free of charge.

Make the slightest threatening gesture toward a man's balls, and what does he do ? He puts both hands over them to protect them. They are the "family jewels" and there is nothing which most normal men fear more than their loss.

Neighbor keeps referring to his as the family jewels. I keep telling him I know of a good bankruptcy lawyer....

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:19 am
by Mininuts (imported)
Bagoas (imported) wrote: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:33 am NO ! The vast majority of normal men regard their balls as their most precious possession. Rightly so, for not only do they make it possible to reproduce, but they provide expensive testosterone free of charge.

Make the slightest threatening gesture toward a man's balls, and what does he do ? He puts both hands over them to protect them. They are the "family jewels" and there is nothing which most normal men fear more than their loss.

That is why i said if the penis and everything still worked as normal would they still want the ugly ballz resembling a used tbag

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:29 am
by JesusA (imported)
One of the facets that facinates me about humans is our incredible variety on nearly any scale that we can conceive. “Would men prefer to be without their balls?” The range runs from those who would rather DIE than lose them to those who would almost prefer to die than keep them.

We know that there are men who DO choose to die, rather than lose their testicles. It’s a choice faced every day by advanced prostate cancer patients and many do choose to die years earlier than they otherwise likely would.

We know from posts by members of the Eunuch Archive that there are men who are willing to go to great (and sometimes very dangerous) lengths to lose their testicles. The medical record shows that some HAVE died in the attempt.

Most of us fit somewhere on the scale between those polar extremes. As for myself, I’m very happy to have mine intact and fully functioning. I enjoy the effects of the T that they produce. However, if there were ever a medical necessity to remove them, I wouldn’t hesitate for even 30 seconds….

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:24 pm
by Prudence (imported)
If "everything still worked" as you said -- that is, if I were still able to have my own kids (ie: body still produced sperm), still able to get erections normally, my body still produced testosterone, ect... If I could still do all of that without balls, then yes I'd definitely go for that!

It would be tremendously convenient to have just a penis down there with no balls, so long as NO functionality was lost.

However since that is, at present, an absolute impossibily... I am in the same mindset as Bagoas mentioned up above. Protect them and guard them because they are very important.

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:09 pm
by Mininuts (imported)
I agree with most of u and understand men would not want rid of their precious balls if it affected sexual performance and maleness.I was just curios after reading many sites where women especially profess their disgust at our testicles and many wish we didnt have to have them and in some way they could be made redundant and removed.Then I found alot of men thought the same whether this was to placate these same women as seems the norm nowadays,I mean men have lost their ballz theoretically as the march towars a matriarchal society carries on at a faster speed.

I am also curios as to how straight men view other mens bodies?

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:22 pm
by twaddler (imported)
"
Mininuts (imported) wrote: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:30 am I dont like balls personally and think they look very ugly and spoil the nice appearance of the penis and would love to be rid of mine.
"

I find hairless testicles to be quite delectable. But hairy ones are just ewww.. ack. Genital hairlessness is a big plus.

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:36 am
by radiohead (imported)
i would say yes.

i dont like balls, they look ugly. i have a "castration desire",especially when i have sex or abuse.

my sex fantacy or sex imagine is i lose my balls and penis.

Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?

Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:52 am
by Gerslave (imported)
Perhaps my personal view:

My remaining ball is not my central point of my live and I can imagine to live without it. But I am also convinced that women generally hate or disgust balls and the man who are the owner of these "jewels". And most of the women are indifferent to eunuchs, in some cases they will make some jokes about them.