Page 1 of 2

Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:43 am
by IbPervert (imported)
Found this interesting article about Monkey to Human testicle transplant, and had to share. I think it raises all sorts of interesting questions and ideas.

😀

IbPervert

http://scienceblogs.com/retrospectacle/ ... _human.php

The development of surgical organ transplantation in humans will always be considered a landmark in medical science, and the scientists that pioneered the risky operations both brilliant and innovative. Well, most of those scientists anyway. One in particular, a surgeon by the name of Serge Voronoff, will live on in medical infamy for performing transplants which, while at the time (late 1800s) were lauded as genius, would eventually disgrace him. Adding to the intrigue is the fact that this surgeon was the student of Nobel Prize winner Alexis Carrel, from whom he had learned the technique of transplantation. The surgery's aim was "rejuvenation" (anti-aging) and all began when Dr. Voronoff became interested in eunuchs and castration.

oronoff's hypothesis was this: hormones, like testosterone produced by the testes, would reverse aging by a process he called "rejuvenation." One of his first experiments used himself as a test subject. He injected ground up dog and guinea pig testicles under his own skin, but was disappointed when this did not result in any verifiable effect. He reasoned that living grafts of testicular tissue, rather than injections, would have a more dramatic and lasting rejuvenation effect.

voronoff%202.jpg This lead to cross-species glandular transplantation surgeries. His early experiments involved transplanting thyroid tissue into humans with a thyroid deficiency. He also began transplanting the testicles of executed criminals into rich old guys (as a treatment for senility and schizophrenia), but had to stop when the demand for the procedure far exceeding the supply of criminal testicles. At this point, Voronoff began using monkey testicles instead, and his first "monkey gland" to human transplant took place in June of 1920.

"I dare assert," he wrote, "that the monkey is superior to man by the sturdiness of its body, the quality of its organs, and the absence of those defects, hereditary and acquired, with which the main part of mankind is afflicted."

A thin slice of testicle would be inserted into the recipient's scrotum, with the hope that it would fuse with the endogenous tissue. This...er...innovative approach was applauded by hundreds of the worlds leading surgeons at the International Congress of Surgeons in London in 1923. His work also delved into the transplantation of monkey ovaries into human women. He even went a bit further and transplanted a human ovary into a monkey, and then attempted to inseminate the monkey with human sperm. (It didn't work.) Voronoff conducted extensive transplantation experiments within species as well: over 500 transplantations on sheep, goats, and a bull. These involved grafting testicular tissue from younger animals onto older animals, to measure whether they received "rejuvenation" and renewed vigor. His results showed a dramatic invigoration in before/after type pictures, published in respected journals from the Lancet to Scientific American.

The proposed effects of his human "monkey gland" surgery were far reaching, from improved sex drive to a cure for a myriad of mental disorders. By the Great Depression over 500 men had received Voronoff's therapy, the demand becoming so high that he had to set up his own monkey farm to keep up. However after decades of promises, and hundreds of patients, it eventually became clear that the treatments resulted in none of the positive effects that Voronoff lauded. In fact, quite a few patients had major complications, infections, suffered shock, etc.

In addition, testosterone was finally isolated as the hormone secreted by the testes, and therefore the target chemical of the transplantation surgeries (ie, to get it to produce more) had been found. But when testosterone was injected into animals, while Voronoff thought they would become strong and virile, that just didn't happen, and it also did not slow aging or prolong life. A particularly loud skeptic, British surgeon Dr. Kenneth Walker, termed Voronoff's treatment as "no better than the methods of witches and magicians."

This was devastating to Voronoff's reputation and career. His clinic languished and disappeared, as did all respect for his methods. He died in relative obscurity, although recently the negative perception of his work has relaxed somewhat. But there is a rather disturbing hypothesis out there that posits that the AIDS virus entered the human population through Voronoff's transplantation work.

Decades later, a David Hamilton published a book "The Monkey Gland Affair" which in essence debunked the transplantations by explaining that tissue from another species would be rejected, not absorbed, and would at best result in scar tissue. Any (rare) slight improvements seen in transplant recipients were likely placebo effect.

Sources and more info:

Sharon Romm. 1983. Rejuvenation Revisited. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. doi 10.1007/BF01570668

http://www.gvsu.edu/english/cummings/is ... llybo9.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serge_Voronoff

1923 Time Article on Voronoff

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 5:05 pm
by KewlDawg (imported)
I remember years ago (around 1977?), Newsweek had a story about a human testicle transplant.

There were these two twins, identical other than one of them was born without any testicles. The intact twin decided to donate one of this testicles to his brother.

Newsweek promised a follow-up story on the long term success of the transplant, but I never saw it.

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:19 pm
by A-1 (imported)
O.K., here is the deal.

Generally, athough the DNA is close, the closest primate DNA to humans is that of a chimpanzee.

In the chimpanzee, there are 48 chromosomes, not the 46 that humans have. It appears that in humans chromosome #2 is a fusion of chromosome #2 and #3 in the chimp.

However, of all of the primates, chimpanzees have the biggest testicles, bigger than man and bigger than Gorillas.

In short, because of their sexual practices the testicles must be of a large size. Chimps are NOT monogamous in their sexual relations, and it is nothing for a chimp to have many sexual encounters, including masturbation, many times a day.

At any rate, because of the DNA differences, it is likely that cross-breeding with monkeys would not produce a viable fetus.

Of course, I look to hear arguments now centering around the genological lineage of George W. Bush... 😄

...if I were you I would not 'monkey' with this... 🐵

:D

😄

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:44 pm
by kristoff
There was a British (I believe) movie from the late sixties (?) on topic - an hilarious spoof. As I recall, it was called "Percy" - at least the transplanted units were so named. Worth about 90 minutes of entertainment....!

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:21 pm
by JesusA (imported)
It turns out that there are THREE movies titled Percy on the Internet Movie Database – IMDb ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067568/). The one released in 1971 is clearly the one Kristoff is referring to. Edwin Antony (Hywel Bennett) is emasculated in an accident which kills a young philanderer. Doctors successfully replace his member with that of the dead man, but refuse to tell him the full story of the organ's origin. So Edwin begins a search which takes him to the philanderer's wife - and also to his many, many girlfriends...

The movie was the first one to be restricted to an adult only audience when Australia began film ratings. It is totally banned in Ireland. It also received only a single mediocre review on the IMDb:

certain level of medical discretion and no excessive lavatorial humour

5 August 2001

Author: rogierr from Amsterdam, Netherlands

Percy (the transplant) is obviously not a very intellectual movie, but somehow funny and harmless. A friendly guy gets a penis transplant and starts looking for the original owner, because he suffers from identity problems. Along the way are sixties' sex kittens Elke Sommer (Shot in the dark '64) and Britt Ekland (Wickerman '73, Get Carter '71). In a way it is actually a very friendly SF without violence and with funny situations and (ironically) sincere human emotions underneath. It's not even bad acted; maybe a little shaky directed. The problem with this flick is that the technicalities aren't convincing and there isn't excessive lavatorial humour, so that kids will probably not enjoy it: the film falls between two stools, because the subject might not be appealing enough for adults (apart from Britt Ekland completists). See for yourself: it's a meaningless little piece with a certain level of medical discretion and appropriate music too. And it's not even the only flick on that subject matter either. Not that I ever want to see it again though.

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:42 pm
by sag111 (imported)
It dose make for a good read and movie but a bit unpractical.I dont think or at least have never herd of testicales being transplanted.This could get us into evelution and the big bang thingy.Its interesting to see we humans cant breed with other then ourselves if it were diffrent this would be the norm not the fiction we so love to emagine.But being man we will try and look at all the money we can spend doing it.I say feed the poor then it will come to some good.

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:16 pm
by Hash (imported)
Why do you need a monkey, there are plenty of men who want to give up their testicles willingly.

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:15 pm
by kristoff
Hash (imported) wrote: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:16 pm Why do you need a monkey, there are plenty of men who want to give up their testicles willingly.

But unlike some of our primate associates, most men cannot fuck 87 times a day. Without that prospect, why would I want anyone else's nuts? Damn~!

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:12 pm
by IbPervert (imported)
I thought it was a interesting article on what medicine has attempted in the past

Re: Monkey to Human Testicle Transplant

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:43 pm
by sag111 (imported)
Yes it is a good read and thanks for shairing that with us