Page 1 of 2

Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:36 am
by Blaise (imported)
What happens when bin Laden sets off a nuclear weapon in an American city this year? Does that prove that bin Laden is still a secret agent of the Bush administration--who will insure that Chaney remains in power? :(

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:43 am
by DewMeAlso (imported)
Can I have some of what you're smoking?

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:24 am
by Blaise (imported)
:(
Dewmealso (imported) wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:43 am Can I have some of what you're smoking?
Frank Rich's piece this morning. The Bush-Chaney jerks have completely failed in countering terrorists.

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:46 am
by kristoff
Blaise (imported) wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:36 am What happens when bin Laden sets off a nuclear weapon in an American city this year? Does that prove that bin Laden is still a secret agent of the Bush administration--who will insure that Chaney remains in power? :(

If this happens, you can bet our nukes are going to rain all over the middle east..... particularly if Bush is the one with the button

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:58 am
by A-1 (imported)
Blaise (imported) wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:36 am What happens when bin Laden sets off a nuclear weapon in an American city this year? Does that prove that bin Laden is still a secret agent of the Bush administration--who will insure that Chaney remains in power? :(

BinLaden might not even be alive.

In addition, I doubt that he could fart right now without the CIA 'getting wind' of it.

But tell me, Blaise, just for the sake of conversation... what city do you see as being most at risk?

(Actually, I am hoping that you will say Washington, D.C.)

🙏

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:32 am
by MacTheWolf (imported)
I don't mind if the target is DC as long as it misses the monuments. The only city I really don't want to see evaporated in Hudson, Wisconsin.

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:47 am
by A-1 (imported)
MacTheWolf (imported) wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:32 am I don't mind if the target is DC as long as it misses the monuments. The only city I really don't want to see evaporated in Hudson, Wisconsin.

BOMB DETROIT!

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:06 pm
by balletkyle (imported)
BOMB DETROIT!

Ah no, not detroit! that's like only 228kms west of me and the fall out would fall on me, that's not cool, plus with my luck they would hit in august during the woodward dream cruise, and that would be very uncool cause I would be there cruising!

try some place where we would all get upset but not really miss like:

Portland Maine

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:01 pm
by A-1 (imported)
Dear balletkyle,

It was an old joke.

Once I pointed out on a thread that the death toll in Detroit MI for the last year was higher than in the Iraq war.

Immediately, the gang started clammoring "Bomb Detroit" ....

...not funny...unless you were there... 🙄

Re: Nuclear Attack on the United States

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:47 pm
by Paolo
Balletkyle,

Email me your avatar's original file and I'll fix it here.