This first is located in Texas - Dr.Diane West, M.D.

http://www.urologyinstitute.com/html/th ... _impo.html

I'm seeing a female urologist, Dr. Stephanie Cripps, in Vancouver Canada. She doesn't have a picture on a web page, but she looks very much like the one you posted -- she's about 29 years old, dark hair, glasses, pretty.

The more I read about urology, the more I realize that castration is their solution for everything. They remove testicles for testicular cancer, for prostate cancer, testicular torsion, and testicular ruptures.

You can be sure that these female urologists have removed a lot of testicles. That is quite a turn-on for a guy like me. Many urologists average about 10 orchiectomies per month!

Here's an article about the lack of female urologists. But it is changing. The good news is that all the female urologists are also young, because they are just graduating in large numbers recently:

http://www.premierhealthcare.com/cgi-bi ... cle_id=830

Here's another article about the first female urologist in Illinois:

http://www.dhcancerfoundation.com/news/

This one mentions "the only female urologist in North Carolina":

http://www.msj.org/urology_continence.html

This one shows a young black woman who won a urology scholarship, and also mentions the only female urologist in Richmond VA:

http://www.uro.com/uronews.pdf

I guess female urologists are very rare. It is quite interesting. I definitely prefer a female doctor. They are much more caring, whereas male doctors only take a clinical interest. Furthermore, if someone is going to fondle my genitals or do a digital rectal exam, I refuse to let a guy do that. This new generation of female urologists is realizing that they are in very high demand. My female urologist has a whole waiting room full of men when I visit her.

Sarah, that urologist looks like WonderWoman Linda Carter, what a good looking lady like her examining mens genitals as a profession? Well like they all said she muct have an interest in what she is doing to take it up as a profession, its likely that its allows her to do this and not be seen as degrading.

I am not sure if all urologists will carry out surgical ops and without asking her I would assume she just does the examinations and advice.

There is nothing wrong with a female urologist. I don't exactly know why one would wish to be a urologist, though, but it is none of my business.

There certainly are a lot of male gynecologists. I prefer, though, a female one.

It seems that many men might not have a problem with a female urologist--is that true? And I suppose that there are not many women here who were born that way, but how comfortable are women with male gynecologists? My GP is male, and I'm not bothered by him (just as long as he doesn't probe too much).

Love,

Kelly

All urologists DO do surgical procedures. Urology is a surgical specialty. You can be sure those female urologists have removed many testicles.

SplitDick (imported) wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2002 1:54 pm All urologists DO do surgical procedures. Urology is a surgical specialty. You can be sure those female urologists have removed many testicles.

Ah yes, but how many would be willing to do a castration for those who simply desire to be a eunuch, without any other medical reason to justify it. (Although why living 10-15 years longer than intact males is not a good enough reason is beyond me)

Andrew said, "

Andrew (imported) wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2002 5:53 pm how many would be willing to do a castration for those who simply desire to be a eunuch, without any other medical reason to justify it?

"

They wouldn't in general. However, I suggest that you can destroy your testicles yourself by restricting the bloodflow, or injecting DL-lactic acid. Once you acheive significant atrophy due to your self testicular abuse, then you CAN convince a urologist that they need to be removed.

Urologists are actually very eager to remove testicles. They prescribe it as necessary for many conditions. They don't even bother to try to save testicles with lumps in them -- even if they don't know it's cancer they remove the whole thing. If you get prostate cancer, they'll remove both testicles immediately. There are lots of testimonies on the web where a man gets diagnosed with prostate cancer and they schedule bilateral orchiectomy just two days later. Urologists do very little to save testicles, and mainly see them as a source of testosterone which is a bad thing in cancer treatment.

Have to disagree. Urologists are not all surgeon even thought they may know about surgical ops many do just checkups and advice.

The lump in the testicles, no they dont go and remove the gonads regardless if its cancerouse or not, your information is wrong. If the lump is cancerouse there is 95% chance the lump can be removed.

No they dont remove your nuts because of prostate cancer, they will either give you female hormone jabs to reduce it or remove your prostate, removal of the gonads does not cure an already cancerouse prostate.

hilander (imported) wrote: Wed Jan 30, 2002 11:51 pm No they dont remove your nuts because of prostate cancer, they will either give you female hormone jabs to reduce it or remove your prostate, removal of the gonads does not cure an already cancerouse prostate.

Although castration will not cure prostate cancer, it will slow it down or stop the growth altogether. Castration used to be used more asggresively then it is now, for various reasons. But used at Stage 1 it usually ends the problem. At stage 2 and 3 it prolongs life. Of course, nowadays chemical castration is far more common.

Hilander,

I don't know where you get your information from, but it is entirely wrong.

You said that Urologists are not all surgeons. The "What is a Urologist" page on http://www.urologychannel.com/urologist.shtml says: "urology is classified as a surgical subspecialty" and furthermore that certification requires "the entering urological resident who has completed a general surgery program".

You said that they do not remove testicles just for lumps. Again you are quite wrong. Here are some links that show otherwise: On http://www.intelihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/WS ... html#treat they state that "ultimately, the best way to confirm the diagnosis of testicular cancer is to perform an orchiectomy (surgical removal of the affected testicle). After surgery, the testicle will be examined in the laboratory to determine if cancer is present, and if so, the specific type. " and furthermore "a radical inguinal orchiectomy is the most common initial treatment for most stages of testicular cancer. " In other words, just to diagnose testicular cancer they perform orchiectomy. There's more about this at: http://www.acor.org/diseases/TC/orch.html where they explain that "they cannot do a biopsy because if it is cancer, they do not want to risk disturbing or spreading the cancer while it is still in the body." In other words, they cannot just cut out the lump because they are worried about spreading the cancer.

Lastly you say they don't remove testicles for prostate cancer. That is also wrong. While there are indeed many chemical alternatives recently, bilateral orchiectomy is still suggested to all prostate patients. There is more information at: http://www.phoenix5.org/Infolink/advanc ... ctomy.html which states that "certainly until the late 1980s or even the early 1990s there was no doubt whatsoever that orchiectomy was the gold standard for the hormonal treatment of advanced prostate cancer. At http://www.cancerconsultants.com/RxOver ... ostate.htm they state that "orchiectomy is a common treatment for patients with metastatic (stage IV) prostate cancer who will likely require hormone therapy for life. Patients may experience a benefit in symptoms in a matter of days following surgery."

So please check your information before accusing me of not knowing what I'm talking about.