test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 1:44 pm
test
Page 1 of 2
Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 2:02 pm
test
Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 2:14 pm
Gosh, Bboy, are you that bored?
<giggles> and you still have a weenie, too. :tongueout
Kelly
<giggles> and you still have a weenie, too. :tongueout
Kelly
Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 2:26 pm
Wow. What an exciting thread. 
So, don't keep us in suspense, Bboy, did the test work?
IEunuch.
So, don't keep us in suspense, Bboy, did the test work?
IEunuch.
Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 7:42 pm
Well, it seems to me that those posting on THIS thread are getting awful "testy"
But I can identify with the difficulty of Doing a "TEST" on a eunuch post site such as this.
After all, it would be much easier to be a tester than a testee, here.
I would imagine that working testees would be in real short supply here. I mean, what with the subject of the Archive and all.
A shortage of testees is not unusual on a eunuch board and this makes testing difficult, even if you try to use your head!
But I am sure that Bboy will have things "come" out just right, I mean just as long as he has not yet lost his head.
It is hard to get a-head in this world, since we are only given one to think with. About half of the people in the world have a second one but it is mostly for ornamentation and vain pleasure and serves no other useful purpose except for a role in procreation for which there are substitutes.
Still, most are reluctant to lose either one of the two heads if they indeed have two. Still, some would like to lose the second one but they are not sure how to go about losing it. So, they conduct tests with losing their head but then go on not to actually lose their head because it was only a test.
I find that if you cannot get enough head, then perhaps you should consider keeping yours, if indeed you have one.
Without a head it is difficult to save face, but that is a subject beyond the scope of this thread and certainly this post.
So, I must say to Bboy, test all you want to but be careful if you lose your head. I mean, after all, you don't want to cum up head to head with another problem and not have a head left to evaluate your tests properly. I have heard of people who could actually "give head" after they lose theirs, but rumors regarding their lack of motivation are vague and unclear.
If you do, however, lose your head it is not adviseble to go on with the prospects of participating in being a testee. Testees without heads generally are not good control models. And a testee without control is not condusive to a good test. Testees without heads are very difficult to use for a control subject. It seems that they are constantly in a state of stress. Perhaps this is why they perform poorly in psychologically based tests involving sex.
So without testees testers do not test well at all! Neither do they give good head work. Perhaps this is a problem more of motivation than of ability, though. Still, it is not advisable to do any type of tests regarding sex with these subjects because it is difficult to keep them involved at the head level.
Well, I know that his post has tested your patience, which makes me the tester and you all reading this the testees. But you must consider that if you are indeed testees, then you probably should be cut off of the eunuch board. This is because it is easy to go crazy if you have testees without heads.
But if we cut all of the testees off of the eunuch board then the testers will have nothing with which to test. To top it all off if their heads remain they are not good without testees. So they are reluctant even then to give head so they just end up losing their heads, if than makes sense.
So some of us must by default keep our heads and be good testees so that the testers have something with which to play around while doing their tests.
Does this make sense?
If not you are not paying attention. Perhaps because you are suffering from a shortage of testees, which tends to be distracting and counter-productive during a test, especially one involving your head. Usually, tests conducted in this fashion just go through the motions, without any viable testees, since their heads are not really into it, and as a result just hang there, reluctantly "going along for the ride".
Like I said, a shortage of testees is not unusual on a eunuch board and this makes testing difficult, even if you try to use your head!
:tongueout
A-1
But I can identify with the difficulty of Doing a "TEST" on a eunuch post site such as this.
After all, it would be much easier to be a tester than a testee, here.
I would imagine that working testees would be in real short supply here. I mean, what with the subject of the Archive and all.
A shortage of testees is not unusual on a eunuch board and this makes testing difficult, even if you try to use your head!
But I am sure that Bboy will have things "come" out just right, I mean just as long as he has not yet lost his head.
It is hard to get a-head in this world, since we are only given one to think with. About half of the people in the world have a second one but it is mostly for ornamentation and vain pleasure and serves no other useful purpose except for a role in procreation for which there are substitutes.
Still, most are reluctant to lose either one of the two heads if they indeed have two. Still, some would like to lose the second one but they are not sure how to go about losing it. So, they conduct tests with losing their head but then go on not to actually lose their head because it was only a test.
I find that if you cannot get enough head, then perhaps you should consider keeping yours, if indeed you have one.
Without a head it is difficult to save face, but that is a subject beyond the scope of this thread and certainly this post.
So, I must say to Bboy, test all you want to but be careful if you lose your head. I mean, after all, you don't want to cum up head to head with another problem and not have a head left to evaluate your tests properly. I have heard of people who could actually "give head" after they lose theirs, but rumors regarding their lack of motivation are vague and unclear.
If you do, however, lose your head it is not adviseble to go on with the prospects of participating in being a testee. Testees without heads generally are not good control models. And a testee without control is not condusive to a good test. Testees without heads are very difficult to use for a control subject. It seems that they are constantly in a state of stress. Perhaps this is why they perform poorly in psychologically based tests involving sex.
So without testees testers do not test well at all! Neither do they give good head work. Perhaps this is a problem more of motivation than of ability, though. Still, it is not advisable to do any type of tests regarding sex with these subjects because it is difficult to keep them involved at the head level.
Well, I know that his post has tested your patience, which makes me the tester and you all reading this the testees. But you must consider that if you are indeed testees, then you probably should be cut off of the eunuch board. This is because it is easy to go crazy if you have testees without heads.
But if we cut all of the testees off of the eunuch board then the testers will have nothing with which to test. To top it all off if their heads remain they are not good without testees. So they are reluctant even then to give head so they just end up losing their heads, if than makes sense.
So some of us must by default keep our heads and be good testees so that the testers have something with which to play around while doing their tests.
Does this make sense?
If not you are not paying attention. Perhaps because you are suffering from a shortage of testees, which tends to be distracting and counter-productive during a test, especially one involving your head. Usually, tests conducted in this fashion just go through the motions, without any viable testees, since their heads are not really into it, and as a result just hang there, reluctantly "going along for the ride".
Like I said, a shortage of testees is not unusual on a eunuch board and this makes testing difficult, even if you try to use your head!
:tongueout
A-1 Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 7:54 pm
How gracious of himself!! And a free test too!! tee hee!!!!!
OK, sooooooooooooo.......did the aforementioned and stated public "test".....work?
excuse me.....I didn't hear that........could you repeat the phrase again please?????
no, I didn't hear it that time either, once more...for clarity sake.....ok?
aaahh....yes....well now....that's sort-of how I look at it too, but if it IS that way.............could you rephrase the original questions?????
Yes, I realize that I have been on this line for a while, but do you realize that the question is still unanswered??? What do you mean, Ma Bell has no way of telling! I have it on good authority that she is still the same mutha that she has always been, and then some on account of her illigimate children skipping all over the place.............................
What do you mean, "hang up!"??? I thought you wanted to know my question, after all, that IS why I called now, isn't it???
Repeat the question? OK: was the TEST, above stated and authenticated by virtue of repetition, henceforth to be known as THE TEST, and so subscribed herein. Successful?
OOOOHHHH!!! Good!!!:p There for a moment, I was beginning to have a doubt or two!! 
Love ya!!
Marc
And a free test too!! tee hee!!!!!
OK, sooooooooooooo.......did the aforementioned and stated public "test".....work?
excuse me.....I didn't hear that........could you repeat the phrase again please?????
no, I didn't hear it that time either, once more...for clarity sake.....ok?
aaahh....yes....well now....that's sort-of how I look at it too, but if it IS that way.............could you rephrase the original questions?????
Yes, I realize that I have been on this line for a while, but do you realize that the question is still unanswered??? What do you mean, Ma Bell has no way of telling! I have it on good authority that she is still the same mutha that she has always been, and then some on account of her illigimate children skipping all over the place.............................
What do you mean, "hang up!"??? I thought you wanted to know my question, after all, that IS why I called now, isn't it???
Repeat the question? OK: was the TEST, above stated and authenticated by virtue of repetition, henceforth to be known as THE TEST, and so subscribed herein. Successful?
OOOOHHHH!!! Good!!!:p There for a moment, I was beginning to have a doubt or two!!
Love ya!!Marc
Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 8:00 pm
Dear A-1,
tee hee!!!!!!!!!!
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!
Simply priceless!!! Loved every single word!!:D
Love you!!
Marc
tee hee!!!!!!!!!!
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!
Simply priceless!!! Loved every single word!!:D
Love you!!
Marc
Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 8:22 pm
...isn't it odd how great minds think alike?
Or...perhaps it is alike that great minds think odd...
A-1
Or...perhaps it is alike that great minds think odd...
A-1 Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 8:26 pm
...he wondered, "Damn! Why am always trying to crawl back into one of them things? They are so small!"
A-1
A-1 Re: test
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2001 8:35 pm
Dear A-1,
nerk nerk, yuk yuk yuk...tee hee...hehehehehehehehehe!!!!!!! snarf snarf..giggle giggle giggle!!! hahahahahehehehehehohohohohohoho....and I do mean hohohohoho!! NOT the kind on the corner neither! hmmmmph!
ROFLMAO!!!!
goodie goodie goodie!!!
They never told us when we was youngsters that we'd be back to visit again and again, now did they???
Love you!!
Marc;)
nerk nerk, yuk yuk yuk...tee hee...hehehehehehehehehe!!!!!!! snarf snarf..giggle giggle giggle!!! hahahahahehehehehehohohohohohoho....and I do mean hohohohoho!! NOT the kind on the corner neither! hmmmmph!
ROFLMAO!!!!
goodie goodie goodie!!!
They never told us when we was youngsters that we'd be back to visit again and again, now did they???
Love you!!
Marc;)