Page 1 of 1

Phthalates & Genitals

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 6:22 pm
by JesusA (imported)
Study maps harm to male genitalia

Pregnant women exposed to certain common chemicals have baby boys with smaller genitals, a new study says.

BY SETH BORENSTEIN

WASHINGTON – Baby boys are far more likely to have smaller, less developed genitals if their mothers had high levels of chemicals commonly found in cosmetics, detergents, medicines and plastics, a study released today said.

The higher the levels of the chemical compound phthalates in the mothers during the final months of pregnancy, the less masculine their boys were when examined by pediatricians, said the study's lead author, Shanna Swan, a professor of reproductive epidemiology at the University of Rochester.

''We were able to show, even with a relatively small sample, that phthalate-exposed boys have an increased likelihood of a cluster of genital changes,'' Swan said Thursday.

MANIFESTATIONS

The infant sons of the high phthalate-level women had more instances of smaller penises and scrota and not properly descended testicles, according to the study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

Boys born to highly exposed women were four to 10 times more likely to have reduced genital development.

Scientists are concerned that these boys might go into puberty late, be infertile and contract testicular cancer because that is what rats with similar reduced anogenital distances showed, said Earl Gray, a senior research biologist at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The mothers in the federally funded study -- including those with high phthalate levels -- showed similar levels in the range and amounts of the chemicals as the average American, judging by previous Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studies, said study coauthor Antonia Calafat, the CDC's lead research chemist.

Phthalates are used as plasticizers, solvents, coatings and perfume fixatives. They are in hundreds of products, including food packaging, coatings on time-release medicines, soap, shampoo, nail polish, hair sprays, detergents and vinyl floor coverings.

The European Union has restricted the use of some phthalates because of similar findings in rat studies. Legislatures in California and New York are also looking into limited bans.

NO STRONG EVIDENCE

Earlier this month, the Food and Drug Administration said the agency does not now have ``compelling evidence that phthalates, as used in cosmetics, pose a safety risk.''

Marian Stanley, a senior director of the American Chemistry Council and spokeswoman for a group of companies that use phthalates, said it was too hard to come to any conclusion from the Swan study, especially since it involved a small population sample.

Numerous rodent studies found smaller genitals in phthalate-exposed males, but Swan's study is the first to look for the problem in humans.

The study, conducted in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Columbia, Mo., and Los Angeles, examined 85 infant boys and used urine samples taken from their mothers during the final few months of pregnancy.

The National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency paid for the study.

The Miami Herald

Friday, May. 27, 2005

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/li ... 751275.htm

Re: Phthalates & Genitals

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:01 pm
by numnuts (imported)
JesusA (imported) wrote: Sat May 28, 2005 6:22 pm Earlier this month, the Food and Drug Administration said the agency does not now have ``compelling evidence that phthalates, as used in cosmetics, pose a safety risk.''

I'll bet Tammy Faye Baker's son feels differently. :dong:

Re: Phthalates & Genitals

Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 3:23 pm
by JeffEunuch (imported)
JesusA (imported) wrote: Sat May 28, 2005 6:22 pm The higher the levels of the chemical compound phthalates in the mothers during the final months of pregnancy, the less masculine their boys were when examined by pediatricians, said the study's lead author, Shanna Swan, a professor of reproductive epidemiology at the University of Rochester.

MANIFESTATIONS

The infant sons of the high phthalate-level women had more instances of smaller penises and scrota and not properly descended testicles, according to the study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives....

Boys born to highly exposed women were four to 10 times more likely to have reduced genital development......

The European Union has restricted the use of some phthalates because of similar findings in rat studies. Legislatures in California and New York are also looking into limited bans.....

Researchers have previously linked similar problems with male genitalia to the consumption of fertility and related drugs by women. Olive Skene Johnson's The Sexual Spectrum: Exploring Human Diversity (Vancouver: Raincoast Books, 2005) explores some of this research in its chapter 1. My own problems with insufficiently developed testicular cords may well have originated from my mum's consumption of such pharmaceuticals. Her doc prescribed them after my parents had been unable to conceive following several years of concerted attempts. In the case of DES, the connexion was strong enough that the FDA (USA) removed it from the market in 1972.

I've discussed this with Ms Johnson, who's a friend, and she concurs that there quite possibly a link.

While I'd rather not have had the testicular and abdominal problems I've experienced, I'm nevertheless glad to have had the testicles removed. And as congenital birth defects go, it wasn't the worst. Maybe I wouldn't have been conceived without the assist? Our regulatory agencies nevertheless need to be vigilent, and I would hope they would continue being so.

Re: Phthalates & Genitals

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:40 am
by DeaconBlues (imported)
JesusA (imported) wrote: Sat May 28, 2005 6:22 pm Study maps harm to male genitalia

Pregnant women exposed.....(text of original post deleted for brevity)
JesusA (imported) wrote: Sat May 28, 2005 6:22 pm The Miami Herald

Friday, May. 27, 2005

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/li ... 751275.htm



WOW! OMG! I am SHOCKED that I just now (in 2014) am reading this thread (from WAYYYYYY back in 2005!)

To me, this is not only NEW "news" but it is also pretty damn IMPORTANT news too! This study should have definitely been continued and expanded, at least I think it should have. I don't want to go overboard with this, but it sure seems to indicate to me at least that there very well could be a real change in the male population of the U.S. and other countries that have high phthalate levels. I am honestly NOT certain or decided on whether the change to a less masculine male population is in fact a good or bad thing, I guess only time will tell.

Re: Phthalates & Genitals

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:17 pm
by ZeuterMe (imported)
When I was a toddler, there was a crayon-shaped sippy cup I loved - but it gave me hives on my lips and mouth whenever I used it. It was, in fact, made in China, before such scandals as melamine tainted milk became well known. God only knows what it was leeching into my juice, but I'm sure it didn't help my odds of ending up here. :-P