Page 1 of 1

Non-Surgical, Non- Chemical, Castration

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:38 am
by n3rf (imported)
Having an interest in Your writers skills and looking around,

I discovered a topic to get CASTRATED by just keeping the Balls warmer

with a simple rubber band holding them back inside the body.

The test results appeared to show a definit decrease in sperm-count

and it had no side effects. Who would know more about that ??

I figure the testosterone "count" would be decreased as well.

etc.

Here is the web site : http://www.malecontraceptives.org

and I like to know, is the Testeron generation proportional to the sperm generation ?? Or to put it another way, if the Sperm generation goes down to very low values like that web site talks about, is the Testerone level down as well to "castration" levels?? Please let me know what You think on this.

By leaving the balls "inside" will I get the Eunuch Calm that You all talk about ??

Regards /Johan-in-Washington [email protected]

Re: Non-Surgical, Non- Chemical, Castration

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:49 am
by Frustration (imported)
I don't think this would affect the testosterone level at all. The sperm count is decreased, not because they are not being produced, but because they don't survive in that heat.

Re: Non-Surgical, Non- Chemical, Castration

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:14 pm
by n3rf (imported)
Frustration (imported) wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:49 am I don't think this would affect the testosterone level at all. The sperm count is decreased, not because they are not being produced, but because they don't survive in that heat.

Well thanks Frustration, Yes that makes sense.

But is Testosteron and Sperm Generation at all related otherwise somehow??.

I read somewhere also that if you are born with a ball that has not been lowered into the sack, but was lowered later, that person will not be fertile later. That was also and item I recall having read somehwere. Curious how that plays out in the real world../JSm

I have another Question. Are the Sperm and the Testosteron made in the same Gland, and are these processes done in separate or combined ???

I like to know how and why, anyone ?? /JSm [email protected]

Well I have been searching and I found this Explanation how the sperms

are generated in the balls.

http://www.free-definition.com/Spermatogenesis.html

But I still don't know if the Testosteron is generated by the same process?

and simoltaneously ?? Who are the Experts??

Regards [email protected]

Re: Non-Surgical, Non- Chemical, Castration

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:12 am
by Geotarr (imported)
Testosterone is synthesized by leydig cells in the testis. There are two chemical pathways that the leydig cells can use, they can use either androstenedione or dihydroepiandrosterone to produce testosterone. Both of these are secreted by the adrenal glands.

The condition you're describing is Cryptorchidism, wherein the testes fail to descend from the pelvic cavity as they normally would. Sperm cells can't develop and survive in body temperature, which is why the balls are outside the body in the first place.

Testosterone production, however, will occur at body temp. It's not produced in conjunction with sperm cells, but both are stimulated by the hormone Luteinizing Hormone from the pituitary gland.

Hope this helps.

Re: Non-Surgical, Non- Chemical, Castration

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:16 am
by n3rf (imported)
Dear all.

I have tried and I am trying the method to hide the ball inside and I think there is a lesser morning rise than before. I even think that getting a ejaculation is much harder if at all so maybe it does work to "calm" down for a "calm down" after all. It is an easy method to try anyhow and is very low cost. Will see.

No I havn't made up any conclusions but I find it interesting for the calm we all seek, I think.

I am also studying Colloid of Silver to keep bugs away.Better than flue shots. Still curious why my Hair Test at Doctors Data for $46 dollars came up with "very high" Antimony and very low Mercury. I would have believed the opposite since I had my Amalgams removed a few months back and had a reaction "wow" from it at the end. I have no exposure to Antimony at all as far as I know....

Regards to all the writers and the experimenters for the calm. From Johan-in-Washingon [email protected] 🙏

Re: Non-Surgical, Non- Chemical, Castration

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:32 pm
by openhead (imported)
I beleive there was a german doctor who sent a message to this forum a few years ago and claimed that she was willing to make a surgery on guys to make the balls stay inside. She claimed that it was especially usefull for mountainbikers. I think it looks soo cool with guys with big dicks and no balls and sac so I would be really interested myself.

Does anyone know anything about this?

Re: Non-Surgical, Non- Chemical, Castration

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 pm
by n3rf (imported)
Dear all. A shield with only a hole for the rod and small enough to also hold the sack would keep the balls inplace where you want them "inside". Maybe. N3RF

Re: Non-Surgical, Non- Chemical, Castration

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 9:18 am
by n3rf (imported)
Dear all. As an experimenter I would think a shield like a hearnia "belt" of some sort would hold the balls "inside" far enough to stay where they are supposed to. Even a flat surface would keep them inside. I like to know if this method will also , not only reduce the sperm count, but also reduce the testosterone level.

Regards, Johan-in-Washington, [email protected]