Can't see the images. Can't understand Paolo's response.
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 3:59 am
Go to the tab that says USER CP and in your options/prefs, make sure that you can view images, it is a YES/NO line. I belive the default is NO.
Someone posted on the technical board that he couldn't see the appended images. I can't either, and I have no bloody idea what Paolo is talking about in his response to the person. I am using Netscape and have okayed images from the get-go. I can see everything on this site but the pictures which everyone else seems to be getting a kick out of. (Mentally insert link to "hot" error message here as humorous aside.)
It's no encouragement to register if I can't see what pictures are here. It seems as though a fifth or more of the stories posted now are in German or French (and I am not about to try stories from here on Babel Fish -- the poor thing would be like a fish out of earwax). More than half of the stories now are straight-oriented (sorry, NOT interested!). Too many of the serials drag on and on with no eunuch-izing happening. Add that to the traditional Internet problem that most people who write online seem to be functionally illiterate (or have their grammar checkers turned off even if their spell checkers are turned on), and there is little incentive to gamble on one's privacy being unceremoniously invaded by the Fatherland Security Forces if Deputy Reichschancellor Ashcroft decides to slap a subpoena on your e-mail registry.
This is the first time I have visited the message boards at the Archive. It was discouraging not to see the pictures and was a disincentive to register. A picture is worth one thousand words. And it is always spelled correctly and has proper syntax. Unless it is corrupted. But, come to think of it, we're all corrupted here, aren't we? Hehehehehe.
BTW, I did enjoy "Lost in Hollywood". Although I don't like painted-up peg boys, the story was queer enough to provoke a desirable response; its being very well written didn't hurt, either.
Someone posted on the technical board that he couldn't see the appended images. I can't either, and I have no bloody idea what Paolo is talking about in his response to the person. I am using Netscape and have okayed images from the get-go. I can see everything on this site but the pictures which everyone else seems to be getting a kick out of. (Mentally insert link to "hot" error message here as humorous aside.)
It's no encouragement to register if I can't see what pictures are here. It seems as though a fifth or more of the stories posted now are in German or French (and I am not about to try stories from here on Babel Fish -- the poor thing would be like a fish out of earwax). More than half of the stories now are straight-oriented (sorry, NOT interested!). Too many of the serials drag on and on with no eunuch-izing happening. Add that to the traditional Internet problem that most people who write online seem to be functionally illiterate (or have their grammar checkers turned off even if their spell checkers are turned on), and there is little incentive to gamble on one's privacy being unceremoniously invaded by the Fatherland Security Forces if Deputy Reichschancellor Ashcroft decides to slap a subpoena on your e-mail registry.
This is the first time I have visited the message boards at the Archive. It was discouraging not to see the pictures and was a disincentive to register. A picture is worth one thousand words. And it is always spelled correctly and has proper syntax. Unless it is corrupted. But, come to think of it, we're all corrupted here, aren't we? Hehehehehe.
BTW, I did enjoy "Lost in Hollywood". Although I don't like painted-up peg boys, the story was queer enough to provoke a desirable response; its being very well written didn't hurt, either.