I just read the comment about a wife needing to have intercourse and having to invite other men int their home to accomplish this for the Male is castrated. In my mind.... Balls are overated for erections. They just seem to come less frequent, but I find I can get them when Im turnned on by a hug or afection. I feel sorry for this fellow. Maybe his wife just needs more than he can provide, but for me, my partner is for me, and for me not to share. I do not judge this as they have choosen their way of life and it's ok with them it's ok with me. I just want you all to know ... whcih some of you helpped me with this issue... YOU CAN STILL ERECT in the right situations..... And so it goes, Scottie

Doesn't sound much different than me and I have all my -- excuse me -- 1 - 2 -3 --yes, all my equipment. I am glad you posed this because I have a private discussion going with another EA member and he doesn't believe you can get erect without yhour balls. I pointed out to him that guys who get "turned off" for contraception reasons still have sex with their wives. Isn't it the prostate that makes the goo go?

I believe that if you are sexually interested in someone you will maintain that interest with or without balls. ANd to add there are lots of guys with the full holster who are impotent.

I was castrated 9/6/2002, 5 weeks later I was horny and took matters into my own hands and I did have one hell of a climax it was the best one in over a year. Not all eunuchs are alike.

River

Hmmm, I also remembered something i read manmy years ago about eunuchs in the Arabian hareems. The reason they began to collect the whole package instead of just the balls when making eunuchs was that they had a problem with the eunuchs partaking of the wives they were supposed to guard. The preference was originally jsut to harvest the balls, but it turned out the only thing that stopped was babies. The eunuchs could still satisfy the ladies and themselves.

There are many reports of Roman matrons having well-endowed young slaves castrated for bedroom pleasure. The reports are that they were able to provide MORE pleasure than the uncastrated.

There is, of course, the famous epigram of Martial: "You ask, Pannychus, while your Celia has so many eunuchs? Celia wants to have sex without appearing to." (Latin: Cur tantum eunuchos habeat tua Caelia quaeritis, Pannyche? Futui velut Caelia nec parere. Martial VI 67) Juvenal also alluded to the practice in his Satires: "There are women who like the ineffective eunuchs because their kisses are always soft and they don't have beards and because abortives are not necessary." (Latin: Sunt quas eunuchi inbelles ac mollia semper oscula delectent et desperatio barbae et quod abortivo non est opus. Satires VI 366-380)

Now that wold make a good story idea.

JesusA (imported) wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2003 3:05 pm There are many reports of Roman matrons having well-endowed young slaves castrated for bedroom pleasure. The reports are that they were able to provide MORE pleasure than the uncastrated.

That was undoubtedly because they could not get off as easily as before. They were "longer lasting" The had "staying power"

...and so forth.

A-1

I enjoy sex for more without balls than I ever did with. One can penetrate his partner much further. The partner can also fondle the base of the cock much more easily. Fondling of the underside of the cock where the balls used to be attached is extremely pleasant, even quite erotic. While I still have the sac, I've heard the same thing from guys that have also had the sac removed as well. It's harder to cum, but many acknowledge that may be a good thing.

I'm receiving HRT through injections, but I frequently allow the gap between injections get longer than recommended. Sometimes I can feel a slowdown in energy levels, and that's when I usually get a fresh injection. I'm less likely to feel the absence of testosterone from the point of view of getting erections or having sex. My erections are shorter-lasting, but they nevertheless occur just as when I had balls. The cum is a bit thinner than when I had balls, but still very similar.