Page 1 of 1
Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 5:25 pm
by Hardball (imported)
As a eunuch, my balls took an extended bath in ethanol; I am pursuing other fun hobbies until I can obtain a full nullification. I recently pierced my foreskin side to side and am waiting for it to heal so I can start gauging up. My intention is to have a 3" diameter ring, maybe 3/8" thickness, installed that will keep my penis unavailable. I have not been able to touch my glans in two weeks, again confirming my decision for nullification. This process goes back to Roman times and was practiced up to the early 20th century. It works, and I am happy so far. Who else has considered Male infibulation as a measure? It is intended to be permanent, and it will also be for me.
Re: Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 6:43 am
by Losethem (imported)
I hope it works as you want it to, but there's no way to know what it will be like to be a nullo until you are a nullo.
Re: Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:21 am
by Paolo
I looked this up last night, and found an interesting article on infibulation. I might post it as nonfiction to the Story Archive.
Re: Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 5:13 pm
by Valery_V (imported)
Infibulation could be also a surgical procedure in which two holes were pierced in the foreskin, so a metal clasp could be locked on them to close the prepuce shut.
Its usage may have had several reasons, for example to avoid intercourse, to promote modesty or the belief that it helped preserve a man's voice.
The word fibula could also be used in general in Rome to denote any type of covering of the penis (such as with a sheath) for the sake of voice preservation or sexual abstinence, it was often used by masters on their slaves for this purpose.
* * *
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibula_(penile)
Re: Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 5:17 pm
by Valery_V (imported)
Paolo wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:21 am
I looked this up last night, and found an interesting article on infibulation. I might post it as nonfiction to the Story Archive.
PREPUCIAL INFIBULATION AND LIGATION
https://eunuchworld.co/s16507
Re: Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:38 am
by magusuk89 (imported)
This is awesome! Thanks for posting it. ... It makes sense of a lot of Nifty erotica(!) It is always interesting to see where folks' fixations come from. Most of the time (as in this), it is huge trends/experiences from someone's communities and heritage that if you didn't know about it would seem niche. I had no idea infibulation was this overwhelmingly mainstream.
Re: Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:52 am
by Devonborn (imported)
Read the article Paolo posted. I’m currently waiting to be circumcised because of my phimosis - I’m in the UK waiting on the NHS, so don’t know how long I’ll be waiting for - but after reading I thought the Ancient Greek use of kynodesme sounded worth trying. So, I’ve spent all day with a cord tying my foreskin shut. Interestingly, it takes the pressure off my phimosis and takes the irritation away. Guess they knew a thing or two, those Greeks! Think I’ll be doing this for as long as I’ve got a foreskin to do it to. Hopefully, not too long. The big issue for me is, what comes after the circumcision? Am undecided at the moment. It is early days for me though, and the key message I keep seeing here is “if in doubt do nothing.” Which strikes me as really sensible advice.
Re: Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:08 pm
by Hardball (imported)
The holes are in the healing phase at 8g with one barbell. No issues. It will take time to gauge up before installing the permanent ring.
Re: Proper Roman male infibulation.
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:12 pm
by Hardball (imported)
I wish I had not been circumcised at birth. With my permanent loss of T, my shrinkage has given me a new foreskin.