A story idea from Badger on Breaking Bad
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:18 pm
Well sort of. There was an episode of Breaking Bad where Jesses Pinkman's stoner friend Badger explained that every time Capt. Kirk steeps on to the transporter he dies, his body is obliterated and what comes out the other side is a perfect 3-D xerox copy identical to the original in every way. So Kirk has died like 130 times over the course of the series.
This is only science fiction and I hope the question won't offend anyone. But what if such Star Trek Transporter technology actually existed and what if you didn't have to kill the person to copy his data. What it you didn't have to make the copy immediately or even at all. What if you could make the copy a year later? What if you could keep a complete set of data, both body and sole, of a person on a computer CD as a contingency agents accidental death.
Consider it this way. On your son's 9th birthday you have a scan made, not a copy and this in no way harms the boy, it's just having a complete set of data recorded for him. If during the following 12 months your son should (God forbid) be hit by a car and killed you could have a perfect copy produced. Then on his 10th birthday you have his data scanned once again. That way you'd never have to worry about losing your boy to death.
But if that technology actually existed would your son still be as special to you? Would you still love him just as much? If three weeks after his 9th birthday he was involved in a horrible accident that left him permanently disabled or disfigured would you consider having that boy euthanized and a copy made from his 9th birthday to begin the year fresh?
Also would you be willing to let him be castrated if he asked for it knowing that if things didn't work out as planned you could start fresh? It's an interesting question and their might be a story in it.
This is only science fiction and I hope the question won't offend anyone. But what if such Star Trek Transporter technology actually existed and what if you didn't have to kill the person to copy his data. What it you didn't have to make the copy immediately or even at all. What if you could make the copy a year later? What if you could keep a complete set of data, both body and sole, of a person on a computer CD as a contingency agents accidental death.
Consider it this way. On your son's 9th birthday you have a scan made, not a copy and this in no way harms the boy, it's just having a complete set of data recorded for him. If during the following 12 months your son should (God forbid) be hit by a car and killed you could have a perfect copy produced. Then on his 10th birthday you have his data scanned once again. That way you'd never have to worry about losing your boy to death.
But if that technology actually existed would your son still be as special to you? Would you still love him just as much? If three weeks after his 9th birthday he was involved in a horrible accident that left him permanently disabled or disfigured would you consider having that boy euthanized and a copy made from his 9th birthday to begin the year fresh?
Also would you be willing to let him be castrated if he asked for it knowing that if things didn't work out as planned you could start fresh? It's an interesting question and their might be a story in it.