Successful Macrosurgical Reimplantation of an Amputated Penis
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:08 am
The full PDF here has pictures: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q= ... 2FMED%2F66 14331&ei=OiirUK6MMYH7igKsrIHIAw&usg=AFQjCNGUkBsznoFO5hLwQF3XzPjqJXTZPQ
INTRODUCTION
Self-mutilations of the external
genitals in psychiatric patients is
also known as Klingsor syndrome. (1)
These patients show a high
tendency to repeating self-aggressive
actions, especially when their
medical therapy is discontinued.(2,3)
In 1929, Ehrlich reported the first
successful penile reimplantation
of an amputated penis.(4) Although
reimplantation of the amputated
penis has a high success rate,
there may be some remaining
squeals such as skin necrosis and
urethral stricture or fistula.(5) We
report a case of a macroscopic
reimplantation of an amputated
penis.
CASE REPORT
A 30-year-old man, previously
diagnosed with
schizophrenia, came in
to the emergency room
after attempting suicide
by penile amputation
with a razor blade. The
time elapsed between
amputation and arrival
at the emergency room
was about 8 hours. The
amputated specimen
had been found by
the paramedics and
placed in a large
basin containing saline solution.
We found a clear-cut through all
penile structures without major
lacerations. The amputated penis
was carefully cleaned until all
visible contaminants and coagulated
blood had been removed. There
were diffuse bleedings from the
cavernosal bodies and an arterial
and venous bleeding from the
dorsal vessels.
Immediately a reimplantation of
the amputated penis was attempted.
We aligned the amputated part
with the stump in as natural a
position as possible (Figure 1). The
septum that separated the two
corpora cavernosa was sutured
using 3-0 vicryl catgut. Each corpus
cavernosum was anastomosed
using interrupted 3-0 vicryl catgut
sutures. The tunica albuginea was
brought together using interrupted 3-0 vicryl
catgut sutures. The deep dorsal vein of the
penis was anastomosed using 8-0 nylon sutures.
Anastomosis of the urethra together with the
corpus spongiosum was then performed using 6
interrupted sutures of 4-0 vicryl catgut. A 16-F
silicone balloon catheter was used as a splint. A
suprapubic cystosomy was done to divert urine
flow temporarily (Figure 2).
The operative time was 2 hours. Postoperatively,
the patient received broad-spectrum antibiotics
and low-molecular-weight heparin. On the 2nd
postoperative day, color Doppler ultrasonography
of the penile shaft showed low-resistance arterial
blood flow and normal venous flow distal to
anastomosis. On day 5, necrosis was observed at
the base of the penile skin, inferiorly between the
penis and the scrotum that propagated distally
to the subglandular area after 3 days. On day 9,
another color Doppler ultrasonography of the
penile shaft showed the same arterial and venous
blood flows as observed on day 2 (Figure 3). The
necrotic tissue was superficially debrided, and the
corresponding urethral segment was determined
to be intact. Two weeks later, granulation tissue
developed and a mesh-graft transplantation of
skin taken from the forearm was performed. The
Foley catheter was removed after 3 weeks, and
retrograde urethrography showed no leakage;
therefore, the cystostomy tube was clamped
and then removed. Examination 3 months later
revealed a normal-appearing penis with mild
meatal stenosis which responded to dilation.
Erectile function could not be adequately
evaluated because of the patientÂ’s psychiatric
condition. Voiding function was normal.
DISCUSSION
The results of penile reimplantation efforts are
related to at least 2 factors: the completeness
of the amputation and the technique of
reimplantation. Complete amputations, both
experimental and clinical replanted without
specific microneurovascular anastomosis, such
as our case, all develop some degrees of skin
slough and are frequently complicated by
urethral fistulas and diverticuli(6); however, these
complications did not occur in our patient. The
possible mechanisms resulting in skin necrosis
are prolonged ischemic time, hematoma,
and inadequate circulation. In practice, the
wound edge oozing into the space between the
prepuce and tunica albuginea cannot be drained
effectively. The foreskin was gradually detached
from the shaft deep fascia. Increased pressure
resulted in skin necrosis.(7) It is agreed that
the use of microsurgical technique for penile
reimplantation can give better outcome when
compared with nonmicrosurgical technique
for penile preservation. Microscopic methods
provide better circulation in wound healing and
decrease the risk of complications.(8) However,
such techniques require special equipment,
instruments, and training which were not readily
available. Efforts have been made therefore
to develop a simple and standard technique
of management that could be performed by
any urologist.(9) The survival of the penis and
its functions depend, no doubt, on the unique
penile vascular system. It was reported that the
viability of the amputated part proved to be
surprising. Eight hours was the longest period of
time between the incident and successful surgical
repair,(9) like in our case. The final cosmetic
and functional results of the macroscopically
replanted penis were gratifying.
In patients with self-emasculation, it is sometimes
difficult to answer the question, if it was a failed
suicide or a successful male self-amputation. In
the early postoperative course, there remains
an increased risk of self-mutilation of the
replanted penis until the optimized therapy has
been prescribed. Auto-aggressive actions can
be prevented by adequate psychiatric medical
therapy.(10) Penile reimplantation using the
remaining stumps of the corpora cavernosa should
be the first line therapy in patients with traumatic
loss of the penis. It restores the functional and
cosmetic aspects of the organ. Reimplantation of
the penis must be attempted when the amputated
organ is recovered. A macrovascular technique
is recommended, as it can be performed in any
general hospital with an acceptable result.
INTRODUCTION
Self-mutilations of the external
genitals in psychiatric patients is
also known as Klingsor syndrome. (1)
These patients show a high
tendency to repeating self-aggressive
actions, especially when their
medical therapy is discontinued.(2,3)
In 1929, Ehrlich reported the first
successful penile reimplantation
of an amputated penis.(4) Although
reimplantation of the amputated
penis has a high success rate,
there may be some remaining
squeals such as skin necrosis and
urethral stricture or fistula.(5) We
report a case of a macroscopic
reimplantation of an amputated
penis.
CASE REPORT
A 30-year-old man, previously
diagnosed with
schizophrenia, came in
to the emergency room
after attempting suicide
by penile amputation
with a razor blade. The
time elapsed between
amputation and arrival
at the emergency room
was about 8 hours. The
amputated specimen
had been found by
the paramedics and
placed in a large
basin containing saline solution.
We found a clear-cut through all
penile structures without major
lacerations. The amputated penis
was carefully cleaned until all
visible contaminants and coagulated
blood had been removed. There
were diffuse bleedings from the
cavernosal bodies and an arterial
and venous bleeding from the
dorsal vessels.
Immediately a reimplantation of
the amputated penis was attempted.
We aligned the amputated part
with the stump in as natural a
position as possible (Figure 1). The
septum that separated the two
corpora cavernosa was sutured
using 3-0 vicryl catgut. Each corpus
cavernosum was anastomosed
using interrupted 3-0 vicryl catgut
sutures. The tunica albuginea was
brought together using interrupted 3-0 vicryl
catgut sutures. The deep dorsal vein of the
penis was anastomosed using 8-0 nylon sutures.
Anastomosis of the urethra together with the
corpus spongiosum was then performed using 6
interrupted sutures of 4-0 vicryl catgut. A 16-F
silicone balloon catheter was used as a splint. A
suprapubic cystosomy was done to divert urine
flow temporarily (Figure 2).
The operative time was 2 hours. Postoperatively,
the patient received broad-spectrum antibiotics
and low-molecular-weight heparin. On the 2nd
postoperative day, color Doppler ultrasonography
of the penile shaft showed low-resistance arterial
blood flow and normal venous flow distal to
anastomosis. On day 5, necrosis was observed at
the base of the penile skin, inferiorly between the
penis and the scrotum that propagated distally
to the subglandular area after 3 days. On day 9,
another color Doppler ultrasonography of the
penile shaft showed the same arterial and venous
blood flows as observed on day 2 (Figure 3). The
necrotic tissue was superficially debrided, and the
corresponding urethral segment was determined
to be intact. Two weeks later, granulation tissue
developed and a mesh-graft transplantation of
skin taken from the forearm was performed. The
Foley catheter was removed after 3 weeks, and
retrograde urethrography showed no leakage;
therefore, the cystostomy tube was clamped
and then removed. Examination 3 months later
revealed a normal-appearing penis with mild
meatal stenosis which responded to dilation.
Erectile function could not be adequately
evaluated because of the patientÂ’s psychiatric
condition. Voiding function was normal.
DISCUSSION
The results of penile reimplantation efforts are
related to at least 2 factors: the completeness
of the amputation and the technique of
reimplantation. Complete amputations, both
experimental and clinical replanted without
specific microneurovascular anastomosis, such
as our case, all develop some degrees of skin
slough and are frequently complicated by
urethral fistulas and diverticuli(6); however, these
complications did not occur in our patient. The
possible mechanisms resulting in skin necrosis
are prolonged ischemic time, hematoma,
and inadequate circulation. In practice, the
wound edge oozing into the space between the
prepuce and tunica albuginea cannot be drained
effectively. The foreskin was gradually detached
from the shaft deep fascia. Increased pressure
resulted in skin necrosis.(7) It is agreed that
the use of microsurgical technique for penile
reimplantation can give better outcome when
compared with nonmicrosurgical technique
for penile preservation. Microscopic methods
provide better circulation in wound healing and
decrease the risk of complications.(8) However,
such techniques require special equipment,
instruments, and training which were not readily
available. Efforts have been made therefore
to develop a simple and standard technique
of management that could be performed by
any urologist.(9) The survival of the penis and
its functions depend, no doubt, on the unique
penile vascular system. It was reported that the
viability of the amputated part proved to be
surprising. Eight hours was the longest period of
time between the incident and successful surgical
repair,(9) like in our case. The final cosmetic
and functional results of the macroscopically
replanted penis were gratifying.
In patients with self-emasculation, it is sometimes
difficult to answer the question, if it was a failed
suicide or a successful male self-amputation. In
the early postoperative course, there remains
an increased risk of self-mutilation of the
replanted penis until the optimized therapy has
been prescribed. Auto-aggressive actions can
be prevented by adequate psychiatric medical
therapy.(10) Penile reimplantation using the
remaining stumps of the corpora cavernosa should
be the first line therapy in patients with traumatic
loss of the penis. It restores the functional and
cosmetic aspects of the organ. Reimplantation of
the penis must be attempted when the amputated
organ is recovered. A macrovascular technique
is recommended, as it can be performed in any
general hospital with an acceptable result.