The Existential Dilemma: Part Two- The Existential Crisis
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:53 pm
Ok, I admit it, I had an existential crisis. This happens when the need to exist is not outweighed by the need to not exist. In my last post no one really addressed that question, is it preferable to exist as opposed to not existing? I reached a point in my life where I dreaded each new day and something happened to me. I realized that I did not have to go on dreading each new day. There was no penalty for ending the game early.
One hundred years after I die, everyone that knew me personally will be dead. Its unlikely anyone will ever speak of me again, unless perhaps someone does some kind of family tree thing, but it wont matter at that point because it will all be anecdotal anyway. As time goes on my existence will be erased from the earth. So if I die now or twenty years from now is of no consequence in the overall scope of the universe and its decay and expansion. I mean, I dont remember waiting the fourteen billion years of our universe before I became sentient, so not existing did not seem to bother me.
So I decided to go back to not existing. Well, I make it sound so easy. After fantasizing about killing myself daily for over fourteen years, I decided to give it a try. Which I did, but failed to complete the job. There is nothing more humiliating than attempting suicide and failing. Then one has to hear all that its a cry for help crap. I mean, what kind of loser cant even kill herself? And one always hears well if they really wanted to kill themselves they would have put a gun to their head. In any event, I ended up not experiencing, not existing. Not existing again, that is.
Mitchell Heisman wrote Suicide Note, a nine hundred and four page paper, that in great detail and well referenced, laid out this case for not existing vs existing being equal. It is a well reasoned paper and it becomes painfully obvious early on that he is going to need to kill himself to prove his main thesis. Which he promptly does on the stairs of the church at Harvard University, by putting a gun to his head and pulling the trigger, after completing the paper and posting it online.
Interestingly, my children and best friend both displayed great trepidation in hearing my intent to read Suicide Note, fearing it might lead me down a dark nihilistic road to a depression laced suicide myself. Here was an example of the existentialists dilemma in action and how it leads to death by ones own hand. This is the fear! Losing the desire to continue this struggle we call life because there is just simply no reason to continue it.
If no one will even remember existing, then why is longevity so important to everyone? Is it just a meme we can not break?
To be continued
Elizabeth
One hundred years after I die, everyone that knew me personally will be dead. Its unlikely anyone will ever speak of me again, unless perhaps someone does some kind of family tree thing, but it wont matter at that point because it will all be anecdotal anyway. As time goes on my existence will be erased from the earth. So if I die now or twenty years from now is of no consequence in the overall scope of the universe and its decay and expansion. I mean, I dont remember waiting the fourteen billion years of our universe before I became sentient, so not existing did not seem to bother me.
So I decided to go back to not existing. Well, I make it sound so easy. After fantasizing about killing myself daily for over fourteen years, I decided to give it a try. Which I did, but failed to complete the job. There is nothing more humiliating than attempting suicide and failing. Then one has to hear all that its a cry for help crap. I mean, what kind of loser cant even kill herself? And one always hears well if they really wanted to kill themselves they would have put a gun to their head. In any event, I ended up not experiencing, not existing. Not existing again, that is.
Mitchell Heisman wrote Suicide Note, a nine hundred and four page paper, that in great detail and well referenced, laid out this case for not existing vs existing being equal. It is a well reasoned paper and it becomes painfully obvious early on that he is going to need to kill himself to prove his main thesis. Which he promptly does on the stairs of the church at Harvard University, by putting a gun to his head and pulling the trigger, after completing the paper and posting it online.
Interestingly, my children and best friend both displayed great trepidation in hearing my intent to read Suicide Note, fearing it might lead me down a dark nihilistic road to a depression laced suicide myself. Here was an example of the existentialists dilemma in action and how it leads to death by ones own hand. This is the fear! Losing the desire to continue this struggle we call life because there is just simply no reason to continue it.
If no one will even remember existing, then why is longevity so important to everyone? Is it just a meme we can not break?
To be continued
Elizabeth