Ididajob spoke again today at the UN, and a few minutes in the USA and French then others got up and walked out. This guy gets way more attention then he deserves, he is little more then a puppet of the Itoldya, top rag head in charge.
River
I did a job speaks
-
Riverwind (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 7558
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 1:58 pm
-
Posting Rank
-
tugon (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 2958
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:55 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: I did a job speaks
get them lined up just right and one bullet coud take out ididajob and the Itoldya
religion and government work so well together
religion and government work so well together
-
moi621 (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:23 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: I did a job speaks
There is an obvious schism in Iran between the poles of power and a third pole, the young people.
Remember when Sadat flew to Israel and addressed the Israeli Parliament?
Sadat did not say anything "new". But the action spoke volumes.
With the release of the two American, Obama should take such an adventure to Tehran, and address the Government and people.
He does not have to say anything "new", but the action would speak volumes and probably weaken the hard liners.
Obama would ask why does Iran need a bomb? They use it on their apparent first choice and the poison come back to Iran.
He would encourage in his most populist style we need to tone it down and talk it up and apologize or acknowledge America's historical mistakes or messing with the internal affairs of the country. (ref. da Shah)
Even before "I need a job's" UN fiasco, I had the above idea. Is he amongst the hardest hard liners or having to appease them?
Remember when we snubbed Khrushchev efforts of perestroika (1959?) , he had to go hardline, then the crops failed - especially his beloved American corn - and he was retired with his life, by the hard liners.
This is the moment for a Sadat move on Tehran. It would certainly boost Obama in the polls.
It is the gesture more so then the words that will recruit. And Arabia will be watching, too.
Moi
Remember when Sadat flew to Israel and addressed the Israeli Parliament?
Sadat did not say anything "new". But the action spoke volumes.
With the release of the two American, Obama should take such an adventure to Tehran, and address the Government and people.
He does not have to say anything "new", but the action would speak volumes and probably weaken the hard liners.
Obama would ask why does Iran need a bomb? They use it on their apparent first choice and the poison come back to Iran.
He would encourage in his most populist style we need to tone it down and talk it up and apologize or acknowledge America's historical mistakes or messing with the internal affairs of the country. (ref. da Shah)
Even before "I need a job's" UN fiasco, I had the above idea. Is he amongst the hardest hard liners or having to appease them?
Remember when we snubbed Khrushchev efforts of perestroika (1959?) , he had to go hardline, then the crops failed - especially his beloved American corn - and he was retired with his life, by the hard liners.
This is the moment for a Sadat move on Tehran. It would certainly boost Obama in the polls.
It is the gesture more so then the words that will recruit. And Arabia will be watching, too.
Moi
-
A-1 (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 5593
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 4:44 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: I did a job speaks
moi621 (imported) wrote: Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:31 pm There is an obvious schism in Iran between the poles of power and a third pole, the young people.
Remember when Sadat flew to Israel and addressed the Israeli Parliament?
Sadat did not say anything "new". But the action spoke volumes.
With the release of the two American, Obama should take such an adventure to Tehran, and address the Government and people.
He does not have to say anything "new", but the action would speak volumes and probably weaken the hard liners.
Obama would ask why does Iran need a bomb? They use it on their apparent first choice and the poison come back to Iran.
He would encourage in his most populist style we need to tone it down and talk it up and apologize or acknowledge America's historical mistakes or messing with the internal affairs of the country. (ref. da Shah)
Even before "I need a job's" UN fiasco, I had the above idea. Is he amongst the hardest hard liners or having to appease them?
Remember when we snubbed Khrushchev efforts of perestroika (1959?) , he had to go hardline, then the crops failed - especially his beloved American corn - and he was retired with his life, by the hard liners.
This is the moment for a Sadat move on Tehran. It would certainly boost Obama in the polls.
It is the gesture more so then the words that will recruit. And Arabia will be watching, too.
Moi
I thought that the Poles lived in Poland?
:-\