Caith721 (imported) wrote: Thu Sep 15, 2011 12:05 pm I think the problem here is that the majority of urologists would refuse to do it, and the majority of cosmetic surgeons would not be familiar enough with the penile anatomy to attempt it.

datyiasp (imported) wrote: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:23 am I've noticed that there are many healthy males displeased with their own genitalia; for an infinite number of reasons.

Men risk much danger trying various methods to ease the suffering their sexuality forces them to endure. Excessive masturbation, performance anxieties, fear of unfavorable sexual comparison with other males, impotence reaction to the vast superiority of feminine sexuality and masochistic pleasures derived by his feelings of sexual inadequacy to satisfy a woman: Just the tip of the iceberg of the sex obsessions plaguing too many men.

Many males try too many rash, possibly unlawful and very damaging attempts to subdue or remove their unwanted sexuality. Hormones, castration, extreme CBT, intentional and severe genital mutilation, saline testicle injections, penis removal or modification, chastity devices, using a gun to blow off his own genitals, chemical castration... Masculinity can be pure hell to a male who feels cursed with it!

Injecting the nerve that causes erections with Botox can curtail those unwanted hard penis issues quickly for a month or longer before another injection is required! We've seen the procedure discussed on other sites. The penis has feeling but even Viagra can't get a twitch out of it! Routine prostate milking keeps things healthy without providing any sexual pleasure whatsoever!

Should any of the above statements actually be true, it seems to be a viable, safe, inexpensive and reversible alternative for providing sexual sheltering to the sexually sensitive male seeking relief from his sexuality issues!

Is this a potential safe way to allow a man to enjoy his asexual nature or is it just another disappointing idea? Anybody tried this?

-