I just read the story, "Willie", by Dave and thoroughly enjoyed it. It was actually two stories in one. First the losing of his willie, then his rehabilitation into the world of sexual gratification. As with most stories I read here, it provided food for thought.

I have often wondered, assuming a man could be assured of having a partner who actually desired him in this condition, playfully teasing and making him "work for it", if he would not find this condition more sexually fulfilling than without the mod. With a penis, release comes almost too easily. Being dickless would force a man to focus all his mental and emotional energy on the sexual act in order to achieve release. With the right partner, this could be pure frustrated bliss!

Notice, however, that this exalted state of sexuality hinges on having a reciprocating partner. If you’re lonely with a dick, you’ll likely become even lonelier without one.

A few months ago a woman posted to this board about having a date with a young man who had lost his dick in a woodworking accident. All he could do was perform cunnilingus on her. She enjoyed his attentions, but broke off the relationship because this guy could never satisfy her as much as an unaltered man. I don’t know what happened to the guy. It was her post, not his (if we can believe the post was legitimate).

Thanks again for a thought provoking story,

Farrell

I must have missed something in the story. I was confused and did not get the point of the story. Forgive me for being so dense.

Correction! The story to which I was referring "Willie", was written by Ibn Michael. When I clicked on the one posted by Dave June 20, Ibn Michael’s story popped up. Same title, completely different story (that happens). Must have been a computer glitch on the board, because Ibn Michael’s story appeared under Dave’s heading. Clicked on it today and Dave’s story appeared.

Dave’s story was interesting too, just different. Sorry for the confusion.

Farrell