Page 1 of 1

Hello - By Royal Appointment

Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 5:45 am
by Princess (imported)
I'm a pre-op transsexual, I've just (finally) started feminising hormones a month ago :) Can't wait until my body is all curvy and lurvly, I also have a secret fetish about having my own private harem of feminised muscle-bound she-hulk eunuchs to pamper me and oil each other's busty and naked sexless bodies up and down for my own enjoyment because they're pretty and yet unable to do anything sexual if they wanted to except kiss and hug and be really close and tender and intimate with each other

Re: Hello - By Royal Appointment

Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:23 pm
by george2u2 (imported)
Welcome.

Was that Studly Eunuchs or Shapely Shemales in your harem?

Re: Hello - By Royal Appointment

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:11 am
by punkypink (imported)
"shemale"?

Do we really need words that de-emphasises who we are inside and focuses on what we physically have outside?

Do you go around calling people with physical disabilities "cripples"?

Re: Hello - By Royal Appointment

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:59 pm
by transward (imported)
punkypink (imported) wrote: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:11 am "shemale"?

Do we really need words that de-emphasises who we are inside and focuses on what we physically have outside?

Do you go around calling people with physical disabilities "cripples"?

To call a trans woman a "she-male or" a "chick with a dick" is offensive exactly and for the same reason that calling a bio-girl a whore is offensive. The terms refer to those doing "sex work."

But this usage was not referring to a general trans woman, It was referring to the contents of someone's sexual fantasies on a web site where such discussions are welcome. And in the context of one's sexual fantasies the terms are appropriate.

I might be offended if a guy on the street called me a whore. In bed with the right guy and having fun, calling me a whore could be a great turn on.

It's clear that society is moving towards a position on pre-op or non-op transwomen that is hugely pissing off both the fundamentalists and the doctrinaire post-op trans theorists. People are coming (pun totally intended) to view "chicks-with-a-dick" as a third sex, a woman with something extra, while both the fundamentalists and the post-ops call them "men-in-dresses."

Transward

Re: Hello - By Royal Appointment

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 4:02 am
by punkypink (imported)
Seems clear as day to me that Her Royal Highness's fantasies are about Eunuchs.

Why would George be mentioning something else? Is he *GASP* hijacking someone else's thread to hint at his own fantasies? Is someone else using an intro thread to educate worse than that?

And really, is someone's own sexual gratification, justification for reinforcing a falsehood that society currently holds about trans women? Isn't that just plain selfish?

Re: Hello - By Royal Appointment

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 5:04 am
by evenealy (imported)
...
Princess (imported) wrote: Sun May 08, 2011 5:45 am for my own enjoyment because they're pretty and yet unable to do anything sexual if they wanted to except kiss and hug ...

Hello princess, I am a transsexual eunuch and just because I'm eunuch doesn't mean I can't do anything sexual. I'm fully functional and have a very healthy sex life. In fact, you're not the only person to think that. I also thought that after my orchie I would never have sex again, or even have an orgasm. But lemme tell ya, I have very nice orgasms and if I had my wish I would have kinky sex everyday! 🍑👋

Anyways, good luck with your transition!