It seems the thinkers in Astronomy are thinking it over.

Who pays for all this, thinking?

"Now that Pluto may have regained its status as the largest object in the outer solar system, should astronomers consider giving it back another former title — that of full-fledged planet?"

If not a "planet" because we were all taught it was or that it made it in under the wire before some got picky picky picky; then how about Earth and Pluto hold a special title of "binary planet system" meaning their moons are of significant mass compared to the, "planet".

Moi

Well someone has to figure this out.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20101122/ ... rtsweighin

I kinda like that is isn't a planet. Nine planets was too perfect, too many threes...

A dog like Pluto doesn't deserve to be a planet. It's probably licking it's balls right now or doing some other irresponsible thing dogs do.

moi621 (imported) wrote: Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:22 pm It seems the thinkers in Astronomy are thinking it over.

Who pays for all this, thinking?

"Now that Pluto may have regained its status as the largest object in the outer solar system, should astronomers consider giving it back another former title — that of full-fledged planet?"

Eris is more massive than Pluto and it is further from the Sun (about three times as far).

curious_guy (imported) wrote: Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:56 pm Eris is more massive than Pluto and it is further from the Sun (about three times as far).

Nope, apparently they re-evaluated the situation. Eris is down and second in mass to, <ta-da> Pluto, not as includes Charon.

Moi

Emperor ,

Federation of Binary Planet Systems.

You know they will fight about this for the next 100 years and in the end it makes no difference, Pluto will still be a small rock way out there beyond and if its a planet or not will not make one difference to Pluto.

River

Riverwind (imported) wrote: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:08 pm You know they will fight about this for the next 100 years and in the end it makes no difference, Pluto will still be a small rock way out there beyond and if its a planet or not will not make one difference to Pluto.

River

small rock

And I thought it was a dirty piece of ice :-\

Riverwind (imported) wrote: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:08 pm will not make one difference to Pluto.

Did you clap to help Tinkerbell live or believe i

Riverwind (imported) wrote: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:08 pm t will not make one difference to

Tinkerbell?



Aren't we all part of the same universe?

moi621 (imported) wrote: Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:22 pm Who pays for all this, thinking?

I Would be willing to bet if given 3 choices and the first two

do not count!!

that John Q tax payer!!

or in my case

that Jane Q tax payer!!

none of this will matter when a black hole comes along and sucks everything up.

Astronomy is such a fascinating field!!!!

Depending on which scientist you consult:

they all seem to have a diferent theory on this binary

double planet theory!!!

some call it a planet satellite concept!!

while others

will refer to it as a binary system!!

WHILE OTHER ATACH INFORMAL BINARY

FACINATING ISN'T IT!!

sounds to me people are just arguing over pedantics really.

astronomy should be about more than "is pluto big enough to be a planet".

that kinda shit is the preserve of bureaucrats, not astronomists.

Astronomy should be about the things like last monday, when they found the youngest black hole ever and aren't even quite sure if its a black hole, and are trying to find out.

Question: why's this topic in the deep dark celler section???