Page 1 of 1
One or two cut's
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 7:42 am
by hans (imported)
In most castration stories only one cut is done in the medium line of the scrotum. However, I've seen many times small pig castration and always there are made 2 cut's, one slit on each side of the scrotum for pulling out the balls. I find this type of cutting more arousing, this means in all my fantasies there are made 2 cuts, each side and ball is cut individually.
Re: One or two cut's
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 10:50 am
by Andrew (imported)
Re: One or two cut's
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 11:41 am
by madscientist (imported)
When operating on humans it is best to minimize incisions so as to reduce the chances of infection, bleeding & reduce post-op pain.
Re: One or two cut's
Posted: Sun May 26, 2002 6:19 am
by JeffEunuch (imported)
Agreed that humans are not pigs. Nonetheless that doesn't mean that 2 incisions aren't best for both animals. Horses are done with 1 incision in each side of the sac as well.
I did considerable research and talked to numerous people prior to losing my balls and concluded that 2 cuts were best. I lost my balls through 2 small (2 cm max) incisions in each side of the sac. Using a torch light, the cutter located places a short distance from the midline where there were few blood vessels. That's where the cuts were. Bleeding and trauma to the sac were minimal. The cutter estimated I might have lost as much as 20 cc of blood. There was never enough blood that it didn't dry before it hit the bedsheet beneath me. I healed very rapidly, and there are no scars.
Some cutters neuter guys with no local anesthetic. It's feasible with the 2 small incisions, but not with the larger incision except at great pain. I had my left one removed witout a local, but decided to have the local anesthetic for the right one. While I likely could have had the entire procedure without local anesthetic without screaming my head off, the local anesthetic definitely made the procedure more endurable. I almost blacked out while the left one was being removed.
The problem with the longer cut - usually 6 cm - down the midline is that there are many blood vessels and nerves there. And a longer incision takes longer to heal. While I totally healed in 3 weeks with no signs of any infection, I knew one guy who lost his through the midline incision that took 8 weeks to heal. While the sac serves little function once its contents are voided, losing it is a lot of trauma - and bleeding - unless the wound is simultaneously cauterized. Minimizing trauma is a good objective.