Just a short question:

Is there a difference in the usage of a Burdizzo if the sperm cords are already cut because of a vasectomy?

Thank you.

Mike

Mike28 (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:21 pm Just a short question:

Is there a difference in the usage of a Burdizz

io if the sperm co

Mike28 (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:21 pm ords are already cut because of a vasectomy?

Thank you.

Mike

Yes. In that case a flat clamp may be applied. Burdizzo is not meant for humans anyway.

Mike28 (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:21 pm Just a short question:

Is there a difference in the usage of a Burdizz

io if the sperm co

Mike28 (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:21 pm ords are already cut because of a vasectomy?

Thank you.

Mike

Doubt there is any difference - none has been previously reported here. And as Kangan said, not intended for human use. Most efforts with a burdizzo and similar methods are usually unsuccessful and highly painful.

I had two sessions with a Burdizzo; in the first I was clamped once each side and the second time twice each side. Both sessions were painless (thanks to Xylocaine), and both were totally unsuccessful. Very enjoyable experiences but disappointing results. Not sure if my nuts had an unusually tenacious grip on life or if my accomplice didn't use the clamp properly.

eunuch2001 (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:21 pm I had two sessions with a Burdizzo; in the first I was clamped once each side and the second time twice each side. Both sessions were painless (thanks to Xylocaine), and both were totally unsuccessful. Very enjoyable experiences but disappointing results. Not sure if my nuts had an unusually tenacious grip on life or if my accomplice didn't use the clamp properly.

The fact is, the spermatic cords are highly plastic (malleable) and are very difficult to crush, unlike those of many animals (i.e., ovines) which tend to be more rigid and more easily crushed. A preservative design of nature one would suspect. That is why crushing is seldom successful (some are, but few).

I have been lurking on this forum for at least 5 years and have been making plans of how to shrink penis and balls. In the late 90's my total Testostrone was 595 when TRT was available to me it was 179. To get there on Dec 31,1999 I used the burdizzo on my left nut. I did it again 12/31/2000 to both nuts. The 2nd time I did this I had to stop a hemotoma by holding a lot of pressure for over 3 hours on the left side. My current ball size is 5/8" x 3/4" on left side and 1" x 1&1/2" on right side. Penis had when 160# been 7 & 1/2" when gained weight and at 180# more fat on pubic bone went to 6 & 3/4" if pushed down it was still 7&1/2 inches currently it will not get fully hard and is 6" can get another 1/2" if i push all the way against the pubic bone. I hope this info helps. I am going to be in the chemical castration area and my life will shortly include a trial with androcur, as it was shipped on 16 March 2008.

SC

I did not have a vasectomy so can not comment on that, see my experince above and a repeat of what was a danger that did happen to me. BE CARE FUL and the best to you how ever you choose to do things in life.

Some info is in Castration primer also about Burdizzo.The 2nd time I did this I had to stop a hematoma by holding a lot of pressure for over 3 hours on the left side. This does happen and if you do not notice what is happening it can be very dangerous. Please be careful if you choose to try this way, IF YOU DO NOT NOTICE STUFF HAPPENING LIKE A HEMATOMA, IT CAN BE DANGEROUS TO FATAL.

sc 9128

Thanks to all for your information, warnings and telling me your experiences.

It is great that the members in this forum takes care each other.

I ask this question only for theoretical reasons. I know about the risk and danger using a burdizzo.

At the time when I asked this question I had an misunderstanding concerning the “sperm cords”. I thought that a sperm cord is identically equal to a vas deferens and there must be a difference in using a burdizzo if they are already cut.

Sorry about that, I had rather looked up in Wikipedia about “sperm cord” first before I asked my question here.

Hi Mike28,

The vas deferens is the tube which carries the sperm away from the testicle. The vas deferens lies in the spermatic cord where it is bundled with an artery and vein which carry blood to and from the testicle. In a vasectomy operation, the surgeon locates and separates the vas deferens, cuts it, and ties off the cut ends. The artery and vein are left intact. The ball continues to produce testosterone, but sperm cannot escape and are re-absorbed.

In a Burdizzo castration The whole spermatic cord is manipulated to one side of the scrotum where it is clamped or 'bitten' by the blunt jaws of the Burdizzo. The whole cord is crushed within a small 'bite' of the scrotum. Thus the vas deferens, artery and vein are all crushed in one go. They are so badly damaged that they 'tissue up' upon healing, and become blocked. With the blood supply cut off, the testicle stops functioning and dies. That's the basic idea. In practice it works well on the animals it was designed for, but human spermatic cords seem surprisingly resilient. At least that seems to be the word on the street. I tend to think that you shouldn't play with a Burdizzo unless you are fully prepared to become a eunuch, as a good few guys have reported success with this method.