Yoli the Troublemaker is on stage.

Actually, I DO understand the whys and wherefors of inguinal castration in most medical situations. I have no brief against it. After all, Doctor knows best.

When it comes to "elective" or punitive castration I want the baggie involved (one might say "committed", right?)

The "clients" balls, in either of the aforementioned scenarios, are being taken for other than medical reasons. Ergo, symbolism and visual effect are important.

Nobody, when muttering "That SOB oughta be castrated!" envisions an inguinal castration. They are imagining that the entire baggie and contents are being rather roughly severed or that said sack is being cut open and it's little treasures exposed and cut off. (Why am I getting slightly moist???) It's all in the visuals, either in actuality or fantasy.

If our special eunuch pal, Barry, sported two incision scars to either side of, and slightly above, his little peepee I'd be far less enthralled when I examine and savor his "condition". The same goes for the two Houston delegates and our new acquaintance, the "Ladyboy" hailing from Asia and residing in Houston (Damn! So far away).

I sometimes look at my treasured collection of eunuch pics, especially the few "before and afters" and imagine the man being bound to a stake or table and being castrated (with me, or someone who looks a LOT like me, either holding his peepee out of the way OR, at least, in a front row seat.)

I blushingly admit that I sometimes peruse a site called Amateur Boys (I think, don't have it bookmarked.) and "select" goodies to be harvested then play out the details in my twisted widdle mind. Am I a sick girlpuppy or what:(?

Anyway, inguinal is right when it's right. For the rest of the fun and games, it's either out of the scrotum (terrible word!) or balls and baggie go bye-bye at the same time. Personally, I prefer the baggie be left unless it hangs down to his knees.

That's all for now...and not a moment too soon!

As Ever,

The One, The Only...Yoleeeeeee!

Available for castrations, international summit meetings, Bar Mitzvahs, children's parties, beheadings, and chili cookoffs.

(That was a hoot!)

very cool. I am, right there with you. Would love to talk some more. Your post got me .. wanting to be neutered.

FianceeUvBigGuy (imported) wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:57 am Yoli the Troublemaker is on stage.

Actually, I DO understand the whys and wherefors of inguinal castration in most medical situations. I have no brief against it. After all, Doctor knows best.

When it comes to "elective" or punitive castration I want the baggie involved (one might say "committed", right?)

The "clients" balls, in either of the aforementioned scenarios, are being taken for other than medical reasons. Ergo, symbolism and visual effect are important.

Nobody, when muttering "That SOB oughta be castrated!" envisions an inguinal castration. They are imagining that the entire baggie and contents are being rather roughly severed or that said sack is being cut open and it's little treasures exposed and cut off. (Why am I getting slightly moist???) It's all in the visuals, either in actuality or fantasy.

If our special eunuch pal, Barry, sported two incision scars to either side of, and slightly above, his little peepee I'd be far less enthralled when I examine and savor his "condition". The same goes for the two Houston delegates and our new acquaintance, the "Ladyboy" hailing from Asia and residing in Houston (Damn! So far away).

I sometimes look at my treasured collection of eunuch pics, especially the few "before and afters" and imagine the man being bound to a stake or table and being castrated (with me, or someone who looks a LOT like me, either holding his peepee out of the way OR, at least, in a front row seat.)

I blushingly admit that I sometimes peruse a site called Amateur Boys (I think, don't have it bookmarked.) and "select" goodies to be harvested then play out the details in my twisted widdle mind. Am I a sick girlpuppy or what:(?

Anyway, inguinal is right when it's right. For the rest of the fun and games, it's either out of the scrotum (terrible word!) or balls and baggie go bye-bye at the same time. Personally, I prefer the baggie be left unless it hangs down to his knees.

That's all for now...and not a moment too soon!

As Ever,

The One, The Only...Yoleeeeeee!

Available for castrations, international summit meetings, Bar Mitzvahs, children's parties, beheadings, and chili cookoffs.

(That was a hoot!)

Yoli,

I am in full agreement that castration for judicial reasons should involve scrotal cutting. The offender should be fully awake and aware with only local anesthesia as the cutting is done. (Inguinal surgery usually is done with full anesthesia.) I feel that is important for the subject to witness his emasculation. As to whether the penis is truncated at the same time, should depend on the nature of the offense,

Without going into details, at one time I wanted to be castrated as punishment for a certain (nameless) misdeed, but the option of castration was not possible at that time. I still desire surgical castration despite the passage of 30+ years.

My own desire is to made to lie naked on my back upon the table, legs in stirrups, with an audience watching, as my pubic area is shaved, my scrotum is slit open, and my testicles pulled out and then cut loose, i.e. a public castration.

What good is an empty bag Yoli? My bag started to look like labia, so I had most of it removed. Not that I'm against labia's, I just wanted the smooth look.

Hash (imported) wrote: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:16 am What good is an empty bag Yoli?

Hashbrowns (Mmmmmmmm!)

Well, I DO like the no-bagger look in some cases. Still, a NOTICEABLY (very) empty sack IS, in my tortured mind, the "mark" of a eunuch. Why? (I hear the people cry,) I don't know. It might stem from my earliest introduction to castration, that gift from female relatives post my near-rape at age thirteen. One of them dug up some OLD and rather raggedy black and white photos, three actually, as I recall, of some eunuchs from the Middle East. One was a white guy, one was Arab, and one was black. Two of them had clearly visible vacant baggies, and one might have been minus sack. I think she (an Aunt, moved here from Spain when pretty much the entire clan did, including Bouncing Baby Yoli,)had possessed them for years and I suspect they were taken in what was old Spanish Morocco. That castration virus was going around in the old days, y'see.

I heard from another source, himself a veteran of Spain's colonial days, that pics of eunuchs were abundant, as was more conventional porn, in those days in the Casbah.

I can state from vivid memory that my early-adolescent >^..^< got a strange tingly feeling the moment I saw those pics. For a few years, whenever I visited my Aunt and Uncle, I sneaked them out of where she thought she'd well-hidden them and locked myself in the potty for a "session".

I once asked her if I could have them. Her reply? "After either I or your uncle have passed, my love. I use them to keep him in line." (And she wasn't smiling when she said it.)

Yoli

Wishin' I wuz fishin'!

Just a couple of thoughts. I agree with Kangan and Yoli, if one is being castrated by court order because of a sex crime, being put to sleep and getting an inguinal castration kinda defeats the purpose of the punishment. The dude should be laid out on a table, feet in stirrups with witnesses, including victim(s), present. Only a mild amount of lidocaine should be used because he needs to feel it and witness his own emascualtion. The criminal should keep his scrotum with scars as a reminder. The punishment of castration, secondary to committing terrible sex crimes, should also be announced publicly, in newspapers, on the web, on TV, in the prison he's doing his time, etc.

That said, castrating sex offenders won't deter them from committing more sex crimes. It will make them angrier. Many years ago I worked as a therapist with sex offenders and recall 2 offenders who had been castrated (one an older man had had testicular cancer as a young man and the other was elective.) Both these pervs liked little girls and had over 200 victims between them, after their castrations.

hazbalz (imported) wrote: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:43 am Just a couple of thoughts. I agree with Kangan and Yoli, if one is being castrated by court order because of a sex crime, being put to sleep and getting an inguinal castration kinda defeats the purpose of the punishment. The dude should be laid out on a table, feet in stirrups with witnesses, including victim(s), present. Only a mild amount of lidocaine should be used because he needs to feel it and witness his own emascualtion. The criminal should keep his scrotum with scars as a reminder. The punishment of castration, secondary to committing terrible sex crimes, should also be announced publicly, in newspapers, on the web, on TV, in the prison he's doing his time, etc.

That said, castrating sex offenders won't deter them from committing more sex crimes. It will make them angrier. Many years ago I worked as a therapist with sex offenders and recall 2 offenders who had been castrated (one an older man had had testicular cancer as a young man and the other was elective.) Both these pervs liked little girls and had over 200 victims between them, after their castrations.

There will always be a few sex offenders who will continue their crimes. In most cases (over 85% according to some statistics [Sweden?]), the offense is never repeated. Serial killers/rapists are a completely different personality type and castration will not help them. These folks need life in prison or death. Castration will help the poor fellow who let his hormones cause him to do something that he shouldn't have.

I'd recommend that the castrated offender be placed on strict probation for at least a year or two. That way, his libido will have a chance to subside.

In my case, I want to keep my empty scrotum so as to be constantly reminded that I am now an eunuch.