Hi, I completely understand you. I went through the exact same thing. The anguish of trying to serve Christ and be Christ-like is very difficult when being Born again with Christ's seed in me and all those sexual uges. If you would like to further this talk you can send a private message. My Christain veiwpoints are not well rec'd here. Blessings, Leona

Leona Lee (imported) wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:15 pm Hi, I completely understand you. I went through the exact same thing. The anguish of trying to serve Christ and be Christ-like is very difficult when being Born again with Christ's seed in me and all those sexual uges. If you would like to further this talk you can send a private message. My Christain veiwpoints are not well rec'd here. Blessings, Leona

I love those little kitties!! We have had 20 cats at one stage. Two females got 'pregnant' and voila... Cats for Africa! We are cat people not really dog people.

Oops, this thread is getting of the topic.

I honestly do not think i could do what you did, but you have got what you wanted, but it must have took a lot of courage.

chemcast scot (imported) wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:14 pm I honestly do not think i could do what you did, but you have got what you wanted, but it must have took a lot of courage.

Hi, I assure you it looks far worse than it actually is. Those two day my penis was clamped I did not even notice it, except when I went to the loo. I had NO pain at all. I did not feel weird or strange during this time.

On the 3rd day I took the clamp of and still had no pain. 9 hours later I went to the ER. They were VERY helpful and the rest is history.

No courage at all!!

Regards

Mac stated that the surgeon was really inconsiderate, but maybe he was just inexperienced with this situation. It's not everyday that a man has his penis removed and so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, however, it's always best when facing a new situation to consult other surgeons. Maybe he did and still didn't do a very good job. That might be because he just wasn't that competent. It's also true that sometimes people seek advice from others and even though the consensus might be to do a surgery one way, the arrogance of some surgeons often causes them to choose their own way. Without knowing this surgeon, it's hard to know where he falls.

Hash (imported) wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:12 am Mac stated that the surgeon was really inconsiderate, but maybe he was just inexperienced with this situation. It's not everyday that a man has his penis removed and so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, however, it's always best when facing a new situation to consult other surgeons. Maybe he did and still didn't do a very good job. That might be because he just wasn't that competent. It's also true that sometimes people seek advice from others and even though the consensus might be to do a surgery one way, the arrogance of some surgeons often causes them to choose their own way. Without knowing this surgeon, it's hard to know where he falls.

Would you want to be left with a pee hole that is high in the groin and points forward instead of down? At best you would have to lean way forward when setting on the toilet to avoid peeing over the seat. Any surgeon with the least amount of common sense should know that is not practical.

We now have 2 house Kiddies and love them a lot. Many here have Kiddies so you are in good company. You sound pretty young and I'm here for you. Blessings, Leona:D

Mac (imported) wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:28 am Would you want to be left with a pee hole that is high in the groin and points forward instead of down? At best you would have to lean way forward when setting on the toilet to avoid peeing over the seat. Any surgeon with the least amount of common sense should know that is not practical.

I wish I could actually see what you are talking about, but I think I agree with you. If it is at all possible for the urethra to be placed lower and close to the anus, angled to urinate straight down, then that should be standard medical procedure. That said, I do believe the surgeon might have done just that IF that were a possibility. From what I read, it might very well NOT have been possible, because there may not have been any urethra left to work with after the full length of the penis had necrotized.

The one thing i have noticed about the medical community is that we do not own our bodies hence the reason it is so hard to get legialy castrated/penectomy from any doctor.

We are basically renting these bodies till we die. So its what the medical community think is right.

DeaconBlues (imported) wrote: Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:37 am I wish I could actually see what you are talking about, but I think I agree with you. If it is at all possible for the urethra to be placed lower and close to the anus, angled to urinate straight down, then that should be standard medical procedure. That said, I do believe the surgeon might have done just that IF that were a possibility. From what I read, it might very well NOT have been possible, because there may not have been any urethra left to work with after the full length of the penis had necrotized.

Hi, there is more than enough of the urethra left. Like I said before, the plastic surgeon is going to fix up what the Uro was supposed to do. If I figure it correctly, I still have about 5 - 6cm of stump left under the skin.

It would appear to me that my Uro just cut off the infected part and stitched my skin to the urethra. The pee-hole is where my penis exited my body. Frankly, I don't know WHAT my Uro did in the 2 1/2 hours in the operating room.:-\

But, it will be fixed. Can't wait...!!

BTW, I'm 44 years old.