Re: Time for Vista?
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 1:35 am
curious_guy (imported) wrote: Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:04 pm If MemTest86 gives an error message it might not be the memory. My brother's computer had memory errors but when I switched the memory from my computer to his, it was still his computer that got errors. Both his memory and my memory tested bad in his computer and both tested good in my computer. It was not a speed issue either because my motherboard was faster and had a faster front side buss speed.
I have had Memory slots go bad, not really an unusual occurance.
Many times a new Motherboard will solve the issue.
I have run Vista throughout the Betas and have 1 copy of Ultimate in the RTM (release to manufacture) code.
I built a computer just for Vista Ultimate.
P4-2.8Ghz/800FSB/2GB dual channel DDR/300GB SATA/DVD RW/512MB AGP8.
I setup my RAM to actually take advantage of the dual channel capability.
It runs fine, but I turn off the Fisher Price/Wintendo front end & use classic menus.
I maintain a computer network of over 100 PCs, and Vista won't be coming anytime soon for us. I already talked the boss out of getting new machines this year with Vista installed. Maybe next year.
If Vista still sucks, I may build new machines and use XP Pro generic OEM which I can get fairly cheap.
I think Vista is NOT ready for prime time. Maybe after service pack 1 or 2.
MS tried to build in so much security into Vista that they made it like the old AOL software, trying to be useable for a green user & protect you from yourself.
If you didn't know anything, it might be OK, but for an experienced user, I think it's a joke.
If I want pretty, I'll go to an art gallery, not the picture on my desktop.
I want my computer to WORK and fast, not show me pretty pictures.