cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:10 pm Have other uncut men commented on you getting cut ? What did they think of it ? What was your motivation to get cut since kid locker room comparing and any teasing was a past thing by age 33 ?

I got cut in my 30's and okay my little chappy was sore for a week or six I consider it to be worth it.

The percentage of folks getting cut in the UK is a lot lower than the States hence getting done in adulthood.

I think its much cleaner down there compared to before as there is simply not that moist warm area that used to breed bacteria and other nasties.

I think this was my main motivation to get circed plus the extra sensation you got through it.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:32 pm Want2losethem,

Did you choose your circumcision details, like how much to cut off ? Or did the dr? It sounds like it was a surprise to you he cut so much. Did the dr say it d stretch out over time or stay smaller ?

I d be pissed. But I m big on dick size. Other men are different of course.

There wasn’t too much discussion about it. I was having my left testicle removed and the surgeon suggested to have a circumcision done at the same time. His thought was they were going to be down there anyway, so it would be relatively easy to just take care of it. I had been considering having one done for a while, just had no reason to get it done. This all changed it. He explained the benefits to have it done, risks etc. I had a problem with premature ejaculation, and he suggested going with a “low” cut, showed me some examples of what it looked like. I told him, I wanted a good cosmetic result and I didn’t care for the look of wrinkles or a “spare tire” look that some guys have. I ended up with a quite low and quite tight cut, the frenulum was removed (really this is where the only scab still remains between all of the surgeries). I don’t care about the shorter look when I’m soft. I went from about 3 inches plus the foreskin overhang, to about 1 inch of shaft plus the glans, so effectively I “lost” probably 3 inches of visual length. It doesn’t bother me in the least. When erect it is about 3/4 to an inch shorter than before (depending on the firmness), which again isn’t an issue. So I went from about 6 inches erect to about 5 inches. If it went shorter, that still wouldn’t bother me. There isn’t any pain from an erection, and I was told that visually things would improve over time and shaft skin would stretch out and the length should return in he coming months. His explanation was that I didn’t want to have bunched up skin so going as aggressive as he did would allow for the proper level of stretching to take place and prevent bunching and wrinkles from happening. If the length doesn’t return, I won’t be upset, my penis length is not a huge concern, and has never been something that I’ve cared about. I do like the way it looks now more than before. I’m just glad to be rid of the pain issues I was having.

Sparky49

That s a lot to give up for your young son to let him grow up looking like you. Congrats on being such a caring father. I hope your son later learned what you did for him and why and that he appreciates you getting cut for his benefit.

I always wonder if women can feel a big difference in making love with the same man cut versus uncut ? You d think they would.

Mine is about the same cut as my fathers, he was born in '59 and me in '89.

I could totally see them taking more skin for more money though. Even though it can save lives, I am not an organ donor because I know that immense profit would be made off of my death. Hopefully before my death I will be living somewhere my organs won't be used for profit.

Ambiguous,

All the cut men will love hearing you felt more sensation after being cut than uncut. Most people seem to think circs and loss of the frenulum especially dulls the penis pleasures a lot. I d think you d lose the extra sensations of all that foreskin and the tight ring and the frenulum and feel way less pleasure than uncut ?

Uncut men seem to differ a lot on under the foreskin cheese and smells, some are oderless and fresh, others have cheese and smells. People debate which of those they prefer the most.

The 30s seem a popular age to get adult circs done. Certainly you knew your choices and responsibly made your decision for yourself.

Did people seem to notice or comment on your new cut ? Most guys in locker rooms and showers don t look close enough to tell unless the circ scar is farther down the shaft enough to be obvious from a distance. But since more Brits are uncut, your circ was likely noticed more.

Glad to hear you liked the results.

Want2losethem,

Yeah, I can see how your painful testicle was the main thing on your mind. Lucky you had a willing dr who cooperated on removing your left gonad. Sounds like he did as you asked on your circ too. Good to hear you like the results and don t mind the loss in length. You re not as vain as me and most men. I m amazed your healing is going so fast. And that erections don t hurt like hell after being cut so tight. Your dr must have been talented or you don t mind pain compared to your left ball pains. Great to hear snipping off the left gave you the instant pain relief that you wanted. Hopefully your right will stay healthy and pain free i d be showing off the one right ball left. Most people will just think your left is high hanging but still there. But being man enough to lose one is worth bragging about and showing off since its most men s great fear that you conquored willingly and smoothly. Sounds like you re pleased with the results. Congrats ! You took it all like a real man !

Prismatic,

I ve heard drs call motorcycles donorcycles. Because they get so many healthy young men in perfect physical condition to be ideal donors from fatal motorcycle accidents and head injuries leaving much of their bodies unharmed.

You and your dad are the exception to my theory, unless you were both cut far down your shafts all those years apart. A Gomco would cut far down even years ago and cut the same way later on. Maybe you both gave a lot of lifesaving foreskin and helped your fellow man. Thanks for commenting and showing some circumcisions haven t cut more off.

It seems like the younger a male is, the more foreskin was cut off.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:19 am Prismatic,

I ve heard drs call motorcycles donorcycles. Because they get so many healthy young men in perfect physical condition to be ideal donors from fatal motorcycle accidents and head injuries leaving much of their bodies unharmed.

I believe that the Ward they end up is called "The vegetable patch" in some hospitals.

cutnbulls2ox,

sparkey49 (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:57 pm we had not had circumcised but when he was two he had an issue with his foreskin getting infected it would not retract either.

Sparkey49,

Attempting to retract a boy's foreskin before the age of 10 to 12 years will always result in a damaged, sore and infected foreskin.

When a male is born, the foreskin is attached to the glans with a membrane. This is the same type

TopManFL (imported) wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:54 am of membrane that attaches the finger

nails to the nail bed. As the boy matures the foreskin membrane detaches from the glans over time.

Any doctor that is stupid enough to attempt to retract a foreskin before 10 to 12 years of age should lose their medical license. In fact many parents that do not want their son's circumcised until they are an adult and can decide for themselves, will insist on watching every well baby exam. Parents will remind every nurse, every doctor and even the guy that sweeps the floor that their son's foreskin should not be retracted.

Doctors often cite urinary track infections as a reason to circumcise infants. They claim (correctly) that urinary track infections are greater among American boys that are not circumcised. What they fail to tell the parents is that in Europe among a similar population of intact male infants, urinary track infections are far less than in the United States among circumcised infants.

Why? Because in Europe they know that foreskins should NEVER be retracted. Why not? It causes the exact same symptoms you described. Your doctor damaged your son twice. First when he foolishly retracted your son's foreskin, then when he circumcised him. American doctors don't know how to handle foreskins on men because they've seen so few of them.

TopManFL (imported) wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:41 pm Sparkey49,

Attempting to retract a boy's foreskin before the age of 10 to 12 years will always result in a damaged, sore and infected foreskin.

I wouldn't agree. It varies person to person. I for example started to retract my foreskin at age 8. It was still quite tight, so it was possible to retract only when soft, but it rolled freely, it wasn't attached to glans at all.