Gotta add the qualifier "some women" to your comments, Salami. A good wife changes all of those opinions.

Paolo wrote: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:31 am To date, I've only heard ONE of the boys, age almost 10 when he said it, say that he'd rather have his '"accessories" just snipped off and outta the way' (his own words) because all they do is get in his way and get hurt. You can imagine the look on my face, I'm sure. Fortunately, this one of my usual charges, as in, "Here, take my kid home with you for the day, bring him back when you're done with him."

At that age I also wished my balls could be somehow snipped off and out of the way. But as that wish of mine was rooted in my several early, irritating experiences of having my balls hurt by girls (mostly my sister) my castration interest gradually developed in ballbusting fetish. But still I poses that castartion tint in my BB addiction for what excites me in having my balls hurt or watching other guys testicles busted is that sort of stirring up my old wish to lose balls deep inside me. I'm no pain lover, no sub and dom fan, my interest in ballbusting is totally based on my dislike of testicles which I acquired in early age.

What can I say. Mine is Latina. I was defending her because the comments definitely do not apply to her.

I understand your case. Something like all my ex's live in Texas, that's why I hang my hat in . . . . ."

Salami,

Sex is a LEARNED response.

...better consider having the ol' tongue cut out, too.

What Salami is saying in several notices I will support totally. It is really better that a man has no balls - so he can resist better the whole female cheating. To be male to be normally on the worse site of life and world (especially in the western parts).

Freedom of these sexual urges will be a good advantage of a man.

And I have personally experienced that women do not love sex and the male dicks.

Bagoas (imported) wrote: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:33 am NO ! The vast majority of normal men regard their balls as their most precious possession. Rightly so, for not only do they make it possible to reproduce, but they provide expensive testosterone free of charge.

Make the slightest threatening gesture toward a man's balls, and what does he do ? He puts both hands over them to protect them. They are the "family jewels" and there is nothing which most normal men fear more than their loss.

I agreed whole heartedly with this post when I first read it back in May (2007) and I spent a lot of time looking for it because of what happened at my place a couple of weeks ago.

A mate of some ten years was over and made some comment about something or other to which I replied, I should "cut you". to which he relied "go on then" I walked toward him making the cupping gesture (you do when u are going to grab a boke by his nuts) stopping just millimetres from (the ample crest of) his fly. Then made the stretching (of the bag) and cutting motion with the other hand symbolic of castration. He didn't flinch. I couldn't beleive it. No reaction at all. So I did it again. Still no reaction, he just starred at me. I walked away.

Next time he came around he told me he wanted to be castrated. (How would u be !!!!!)

do you think he really meant it? if so, would you want to do it?

emasculateme (imported) wrote: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:29 am do you think he really meant it? if so, would you want to do it?

Yes I do think he meant it and I would love to be the one to put his fat puppies in a jar.

Definitely better for men to be free of testosterone. Do whatever it takes to get rid of sexual urges and all the other bad things associated with T. Men need all the advantages they can get nowadays. I am fully dedicated to the eunuch cause. I want to help all the men in this world who desire castration to achieve that precious goal. I am the eunuch version of Vladimir Lenin LOL!

Yes i think my small dick would look good with out its big heavy balls getting in the way .