Patient (imported) wrote: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:52 am I think an intact prepuce would both conceal the corona and produce a more pointed tip, so I vote for circumcised. But more strongly I believe the artist meant this to be ambiguous.

.

It sort of does and sometimes will. (Your first sentance.) So it generally has a more "tapered" look. However, even in intact boys, you can see the outline of the corona under the foreskin so... I think it is just easier to draw penises "straight" than the "details" of being circumcised. However, I still vote this "smilie" to be intact.

i was forced to be circumcised at 12 by my dad. At the time i hated him and that experience, but growing up i apreciated it, and now i want more

John W. (imported) wrote: Tue Sep 13, 2005 2:21 am Those who were involuntarily circumcized as babies, including for pseudo-religious reasons, should sue the doctors concerned, and their parents if it was done with their knowledge or consent, and any ministers of religion involved, to their last nickels. BTW it is now illegal to do it involuntarily in Canada to babies, as the result of the David Reimer case in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

It is not illegal to circumcise a baby in Canada. You just have to pay for it, as it is not paid for by the health plans. Female circumcision is illegal, but male is not.

The doctors still routinely do it and give all sorts of reasons for doing it. It as one person said is a cure looking for a disease. They are now touting it as a preventative for HIV

and the US NIH and religious right are gearing up to circumcise Africa. The actual amount of protection if any is very small. ie if you fuck 3 HIV infected persons a day for a year it might delay your infection by an average of 1 person.

I was only partly circumcised in that the foreskin still covers about half of the glans. For a time I thought this was how I'd been born until I enquired of my urologist and he said that, in some other countries (I was born in South Africa) and some hospitals, it was the custom to only remove as much skin as was felt necessary to allow urine to flow and not leave residue on the penis. It's a very convenient arrangement for me in that I avoid the peeled eel look and still have easy access to my glans. The skin isn't too tight, the "look" is good...If you're considering having the procedure you might ask that they do this proportional removal. If it's not what you want, you can have the rest removed.

I was circumcised at age 30,and I definitly would not want to be like the way I was when I was born again.Many people call themselves experts on this,but the only expert is a person who was circed as an adult after being married for some time.I was married for 8 years.Most people who complain were circed as a baby or not circed at all,so they do not know the difference.Another expert is a woman who has had the same man both ways.Anyone else does not know what whey are talking about.

My wife says it depends on what you are planning to do with it.To play with, maybe having a skin is better,but to do it, circed is definitly better.

I am a male of 75 years and married to the same woman 51years

I should have mentioned this before as I do get some static about my opinions.Some of the folks out there do not agree with my thoughts.

I have a euro cut so it is not a tight cut I have extra skin, I wonder what it must be like to be cut very tightly, guess it is sometihng that is not done so often now.

with the new cervical cancer vaccine..circ for that reason is mute

everyone has different anatomy and nerve endings

i would never give up my foreskin

it has given me so much enjoyment ..even after being castrated...i have never indulged into oral sex..with a foreskin there is no need

i was circumcised at age 12 on my aunts advise she was married to a american soldier based at that time near us in scotland,their 3 boys were all circumcised as most americans where,i had no chioce it was digust in front of me my penis was handled by aunt and mother pulling skin back and them agreeing it looked better and cleaner..anyway it was done i already had a very small penis now it looked micro not more than 1 inch later when i managed a erection got to 3 inches(its now 4.5")...now in scotland few wher circumcised me being only one in whole school and it being tiny everone found out i was named "tinywinkie" i was made show it to girls as i was told to say over and over as they laughed "im richard with the tiny skinleess winkie" must have been my destiny even then i enjoyed the humiliation although not advancing my sex life in later years at school i was still made to show it now wankig for their amusment....20 years on i love been humiliated my wife encourages her friends,work mates 5 sisters to make remarks about my "tiny winkie" as she knows ill wank soon as i can...iv been asured that foreskined is better my wife janice never goes back on that i think myself a foreskins more manly..real cock...but im happy with my skinleess winkie it suits my pathetic excuse for a man siisy lifstlye../..Rachel

Having the odor of smigma makes a man. I was tightly circumcized, I can not have smigma, therefore I will never be a man.