Re: Castration stories about kids
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:43 am
I think writing is a good therapy. Thats completely true. Ive found out quite recently how writing is an astonishing way to free your soul from a bunch of repressed things which I suppose quite everybody out there keeps hidden inside his souls and never has the courage or the chance to let them flow out. And writing on your own experiences when they are not happy and positive is always harmful. But it has the great advantage to make you feel free and well at least psychologically, because it often happens that you are not at your ease living with them.
Thats not the case of those writers who write fiction and invented stories. Even if they have a real background, I think such stories represent an impossible reality. Unrealistic situations, unbelievable facts, untrue characters are generally the expression of who and what writers themselves are and what they feel at the time of writing. I am quite convinced that they generally wish to represent a reality that theyd have wanted to live years before but they werent able or allowed to live. And they do their best to show such a reality as true as possible because they are trying to find a way out of or an answer to their psychological situation which generally is a mixture of repressions, sexual tendencies, unexpressed desires, social behaviours, unhappy experiences.
Im not saying that castration of minors didnt and doesnt exist. It existed but it was always a limited phenomenon relegated in upper social classes and in specific times. Medical castration does exist for the many painful situations of disease and accident.
But voluntary castration of minors is another story. No minor physically and psychologically healthy can want his castration. No parent can want his sons castration. No medical, police authority or whoever may want castration of a kid to cure whatever deviate behaviour or psychological disease.
So in my opinion writing about minor castration is rather neutral: it does not induce to harm kids but it neither is a good thing. But moral judgment is personal and everybody should keep it for what it is and not to make the others use his same judgment measure.
But the threads here have forgotten what I think is most important for me and a tremendous aspect of the same question: psychological castration. It may be, and in a lot of cases it is, more destroying than physical castration of minors. There are cases, and in greater number than one may imagine, of teenagers compelled and convinced to hate their sexual organs and that they can live better forgetting them only because they are seen as bad things, causing teenagers to became wicked and sinful. A weak mind, such as the one of a minor, is often easy to be controlled and conditioned. Thats the real damage that a bad education causes in minors and sometimes its worse than physical castration. All this results into a terrible situation where some men leaving their teenage period, have no positive relation with their sexual organs and find it impossible to use them properly in their relation with both the same or the other sex. They are real eunuchs.
I would like to know what guys out there think of all this.
Thats not the case of those writers who write fiction and invented stories. Even if they have a real background, I think such stories represent an impossible reality. Unrealistic situations, unbelievable facts, untrue characters are generally the expression of who and what writers themselves are and what they feel at the time of writing. I am quite convinced that they generally wish to represent a reality that theyd have wanted to live years before but they werent able or allowed to live. And they do their best to show such a reality as true as possible because they are trying to find a way out of or an answer to their psychological situation which generally is a mixture of repressions, sexual tendencies, unexpressed desires, social behaviours, unhappy experiences.
Im not saying that castration of minors didnt and doesnt exist. It existed but it was always a limited phenomenon relegated in upper social classes and in specific times. Medical castration does exist for the many painful situations of disease and accident.
But voluntary castration of minors is another story. No minor physically and psychologically healthy can want his castration. No parent can want his sons castration. No medical, police authority or whoever may want castration of a kid to cure whatever deviate behaviour or psychological disease.
So in my opinion writing about minor castration is rather neutral: it does not induce to harm kids but it neither is a good thing. But moral judgment is personal and everybody should keep it for what it is and not to make the others use his same judgment measure.
But the threads here have forgotten what I think is most important for me and a tremendous aspect of the same question: psychological castration. It may be, and in a lot of cases it is, more destroying than physical castration of minors. There are cases, and in greater number than one may imagine, of teenagers compelled and convinced to hate their sexual organs and that they can live better forgetting them only because they are seen as bad things, causing teenagers to became wicked and sinful. A weak mind, such as the one of a minor, is often easy to be controlled and conditioned. Thats the real damage that a bad education causes in minors and sometimes its worse than physical castration. All this results into a terrible situation where some men leaving their teenage period, have no positive relation with their sexual organs and find it impossible to use them properly in their relation with both the same or the other sex. They are real eunuchs.
I would like to know what guys out there think of all this.