Re: Death of Fiction?
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:16 pm
This will probably be a lengthy and venting post, but it needs to be said. I'm a writer who has written a lot, who lost stories in the move and have yet to been recovered, and one with more stories on my hard drive I have yet to post.
First, any excuse that authors don't post their stories because of lack of reviews is unfounded. I highly doubt that many authors write JUST for an audience in this community, authors write out their own fantasies and stories in their mind. Some do have a community of followers, but to this date I am sure many of them write their own fantasies or desires, or just something that pops in their mind. Getting reviews is nice, but in the end, my story was for me. I just posted it for others because it only took me an extra five minutes.
The issue is the process through which to get the casual writer and reader antiquated with the board.
The old system was great, very easy to navigate. I actually go to the Wayback Archives to access the stories now- that system worked. The new system, while having nifty features, is flawed. This is not to say either is better or worse.
What needs to happen right now is an immediate return to the system- with all stories unedited, returned. Place the link to this version in the new code- all that needs to be done is just copying all the HTML files. This would be the "compatibility version". The old system worked, but the new system is a work in progress.
All that needs to be done is the folder containing all the back up HTML/PHP/Codes to be placed on the server and the navigation link posted.
Why do this? A few things:
1) The old system was easier and many stories were lost. Many people stopped reading and caring, myself included, after the move and fiasco from a few years ago. It did probably save me because it stopped my unhealthy addiction to looking at stories nonstop. But still, it was a giant black hole that has very little light coming out of it today.
2) The reasons for the new system are good, but while the bugs are being worked out, it should be "Eunuch Archive bEtA" (Note my EA in the caps!).
3) Preserving access to the old navigation and returning the unedited stories can be done to increase readership and slowly move stories away. I'm sure if you can get more readers reading stories, more people will return to viewing and reading.
4) If more stories are there to be read, more people will want to add new stories to the archive.
5) With all the old stories, readers and authors will be more motivated to get their stories edited to meet the needs of the old archive. Right now, there is no real access to the old stories for the casual reader or author to just look at a story and fix it on their own- all the old stories are held in some secretive vault in Newfoundland. If anyone wants to fix it, so it isn't just one person, it's a whole saga just to do it.
6) Log in, fine, no issue. Make the back up version only accessible through a link past the password.
I fully understand the reasons for going through the old stories. I agree with the prohibitions about minors and death, with a major exception:
Many of my stories are tagged as minor- university in the USA refers to people over 18 (with the rare 17 year old). University in a story does NOT imply underage.
Keep working on editing the stories, but when someone requests a new story to be fixed, and stories still aren't being fixed and added, it makes the reader not even care to visit the site.
I'm sure there are ways you can make coding easier on the new site, but until we can see all the old stories and get our "spirits" and "morale" back, it's going to be the Dark Ages of the EA- even worse than before the site even existed. We know something is out there- but impossible to access.
A few comments from readers struck me as very appropriate:
As I noted, the despondency of the casual reader has been lost, when you're stuck with a core group of readers, fine, but never at the sacrifice of the fringes of our inclusive society.
Simply put, true, and honest. My experience wholeheartedly. Even worse was the loss of Google Cache- that was more up to date.
My suggestions Elizabeth about navigation issues were never addressed, makes it hard to go back and forth without having to delete text out of the URL in the address bar.
(Jearns cut for space)
You speak for thousands of viewers. Thanks.
In the end, a lot of us really do care. We care to read and visit on our own time. But like many, we're lazy. Not to say it's a bad thing, but we want things working easily, we don't always like radical change (Better or worse), We just want a simple way to read stories. If there is an easy way to add a comment or a script, add it over time. Right now, we just want simplicity back, while we can still improve the new archive.
Lack of reviews isn't an issue: although reviews randomly disappear after a period of time, why bother writing them? I wrote reviews of stories between 2005-2010, but where are they? poof! gone! and they were gone before the move.
It's lack of casual fringes of our group having easy access and easy viewing. Keep working on the bEtA site, it'll get better and when all stories are migrated, it'll be nice. But until everything is worked out, retain the ability to access the now-defunct stories. Without seeing all that there is to offer, we lose readership- and that has destroyed this archive more than anything else.
First, any excuse that authors don't post their stories because of lack of reviews is unfounded. I highly doubt that many authors write JUST for an audience in this community, authors write out their own fantasies and stories in their mind. Some do have a community of followers, but to this date I am sure many of them write their own fantasies or desires, or just something that pops in their mind. Getting reviews is nice, but in the end, my story was for me. I just posted it for others because it only took me an extra five minutes.
The issue is the process through which to get the casual writer and reader antiquated with the board.
The old system was great, very easy to navigate. I actually go to the Wayback Archives to access the stories now- that system worked. The new system, while having nifty features, is flawed. This is not to say either is better or worse.
What needs to happen right now is an immediate return to the system- with all stories unedited, returned. Place the link to this version in the new code- all that needs to be done is just copying all the HTML files. This would be the "compatibility version". The old system worked, but the new system is a work in progress.
All that needs to be done is the folder containing all the back up HTML/PHP/Codes to be placed on the server and the navigation link posted.
Why do this? A few things:
1) The old system was easier and many stories were lost. Many people stopped reading and caring, myself included, after the move and fiasco from a few years ago. It did probably save me because it stopped my unhealthy addiction to looking at stories nonstop. But still, it was a giant black hole that has very little light coming out of it today.
2) The reasons for the new system are good, but while the bugs are being worked out, it should be "Eunuch Archive bEtA" (Note my EA in the caps!).
3) Preserving access to the old navigation and returning the unedited stories can be done to increase readership and slowly move stories away. I'm sure if you can get more readers reading stories, more people will return to viewing and reading.
4) If more stories are there to be read, more people will want to add new stories to the archive.
5) With all the old stories, readers and authors will be more motivated to get their stories edited to meet the needs of the old archive. Right now, there is no real access to the old stories for the casual reader or author to just look at a story and fix it on their own- all the old stories are held in some secretive vault in Newfoundland. If anyone wants to fix it, so it isn't just one person, it's a whole saga just to do it.
6) Log in, fine, no issue. Make the back up version only accessible through a link past the password.
I fully understand the reasons for going through the old stories. I agree with the prohibitions about minors and death, with a major exception:
Many of my stories are tagged as minor- university in the USA refers to people over 18 (with the rare 17 year old). University in a story does NOT imply underage.
Keep working on editing the stories, but when someone requests a new story to be fixed, and stories still aren't being fixed and added, it makes the reader not even care to visit the site.
I'm sure there are ways you can make coding easier on the new site, but until we can see all the old stories and get our "spirits" and "morale" back, it's going to be the Dark Ages of the EA- even worse than before the site even existed. We know something is out there- but impossible to access.
A few comments from readers struck me as very appropriate:
wannabe (imported) wrote: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:39 am the reason why the archive is struggling a little is this (in my opinion)
1) like anything, if it gets messed up, and isnt repaired quick enough, interest is lost and despondency sets in, not saying the effort put in isnt appreciated by far it is, just saying its human nature to become despondent after 12 months of none finished repair... its life
2) i dont think login is an issue, if something as simple as logging in saves it, thats fine, but, alot of stories are still missing AND all over the place in wrong sections, and the New Stories... stories should only be in there for a week maximum, otheriwse it just looks shit.
As I noted, the despondency of the casual reader has been lost, when you're stuck with a core group of readers, fine, but never at the sacrifice of the fringes of our inclusive society.
DeaconBlues (imported) wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:55 pm What fhunter said, well "my sentiments exactly" or "I couldn't have said it better myself."
But then... my reading paradise was lost, for some (I suppose very good) reason, the archive had to be put is some sort of lock up, hard to get to, hard to remember passwords, just not like it once was.
I know how everyone gets so angry because of any criticism here, so I generally just keep my mouth shut about it, but I miss the old simple archive, that was easy for me to get to.
Simply put, true, and honest. My experience wholeheartedly. Even worse was the loss of Google Cache- that was more up to date.
Elizabeth (imported) wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:04 pm Well, I agree with whoever said it's a huge hassle now. There is not even a link to the archive once one is in the forum. If I want to go to the archive, I have to open a new window, go to my original bookmark again, select the archive, then enter my name and password again. Surfing the archive used to be easy. Now it's not. It's really that simple. I would start with at least a link to the archive from inside the forum.
Elizabeth
My suggestions Elizabeth about navigation issues were never addressed, makes it hard to go back and forth without having to delete text out of the URL in the address bar.
fhunter wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:28 pm In no ways I want to complain, but, I almost stopped reading the archive.
In the good old days it "just worked".
(Jearns cut for space)
fhunter wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:28 pm I do not want to belittle the great work of those, who made a new story archive. And I do understand the need to protect the site.
You speak for thousands of viewers. Thanks.
In the end, a lot of us really do care. We care to read and visit on our own time. But like many, we're lazy. Not to say it's a bad thing, but we want things working easily, we don't always like radical change (Better or worse), We just want a simple way to read stories. If there is an easy way to add a comment or a script, add it over time. Right now, we just want simplicity back, while we can still improve the new archive.
Lack of reviews isn't an issue: although reviews randomly disappear after a period of time, why bother writing them? I wrote reviews of stories between 2005-2010, but where are they? poof! gone! and they were gone before the move.
It's lack of casual fringes of our group having easy access and easy viewing. Keep working on the bEtA site, it'll get better and when all stories are migrated, it'll be nice. But until everything is worked out, retain the ability to access the now-defunct stories. Without seeing all that there is to offer, we lose readership- and that has destroyed this archive more than anything else.