Page 4 of 4
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:03 am
by Slammr (imported)
My mother and her 11 siblings were all red heads. My dad had black hair; my sisters and I have brown hair.
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:48 pm
by moi621 (imported)
No pre employment blood sample should be legally sent to such as this link.
http://www.igenea.com/en/
Someone please get on that law.
Moi
Enjoy the link. It is fascinating.
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:06 pm
by transward (imported)
moi621 (imported) wrote: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:48 pm
No pre employment blood sample should be legally sent to such as this link.
http://www.igenea.com/en/
Someone please get on that law.
Moi
Enjoy the link. It is fascinating.
Are you suggesting development of a prenatal DNA test for red headedness? I did see that sperm banks worldwide are refusing donations from red headed men.
http://technorati.com/women/article/wor ... k-says-no/
Redheads who seek to donate at one of the world’s largest sperm banks will likely find themselves turned away at the door. ...Cryos International, with offices in Denmark, New York and India, has informed the media that their supplies of sperm provided by red-headed donors are full, and that there just isn’t enough demand to require more - at least in the short term.
I can see it now. "Ms Moi, our tests have shown that your child will be red-headed. Are you sure you want to go through with the pregnancy? You realize we can't guarantee that he won't grow up and become a Republican presidential candidate? Could you live with that? Consider the shame."
Transward
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:13 pm
by moi621 (imported)
Red hair, "the ginger gene" is not one gene.
That is evident by the various "reds" out there.
BTW there are brother and sister carrot tops down the street.
Neither parent has a family history of red hair. Both are fair complexions.
Less we forget
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/1 ... ingervitus
Interesting find about the sperm banks. Now YOU connect the dots
Moi
Could someone check criminal statistics and red hair.
I believe it is a + but, have not referenced it for years.
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:28 am
by Riverwind (imported)
By chance are there names Farkle?
River
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:57 pm
by Uncle Flo (imported)
Yes, Simon and Gar Farkle. --FLO--
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:31 pm
by Riverwind (imported)
we are aging our self's but I can still see the UN-identical twins, you know Goldie Hawn is 66 and still looks great.
River
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:39 pm
by Sweetpickle (imported)
Moi probably has no clue.
That was a fun time.
Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:55 pm
by moi621 (imported)
The Goldie of today is hardly recognizable from that
go-go dancer of Laugh-In by some forty pounds.
Time sucks.

Re: Scientific Racism (Yet Again!)
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:05 pm
by ChristianPath (imported)
JesusA (imported) wrote: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:50 am
In 40 species of wild vertebrates, darker pigmented individuals are more aggressive and sexually active.
=> Their data is Bull-Shit.
Did they correct for the bonferroni adjustment. Their study group probably came from the US where Black people used to be slaves and NEVER GOT THEIR DUE REPARATION. These ignorant racist bastards need to be slapped in the face for producing bad science based on racism.