Let's experiment, Jim..rawr!!



Ms. XNoCTuRNaLRoSeX,

As I get to know you, I already know how my body will respond!

Let the experiments begin!

- Jim

Mr. Jim,

Just give me a minute to put on my fangs..and I'm all yours! *bite*

XNoCTuRNaLRoSeX (imported) wrote: Fri Aug 16, 2002 2:43 pm Mr. Jim, Just give me a minute to put on my fangs..and I'm all yours! *bite*

Dear Ms. XNoCTuRNaLRoSeX,

I thought those might be included -- and I'm still okay with that.

If I am to have a mid-life awakening, I might as well go all the way!

Humbly,

- Jim

Mr. Jim,

I knew you might..

Mac (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2002 5:28 am Will that attitude change with the advent of more women doctors? Will they be more willing to remove a man's penis and testicles?

I'm a physician. I am empathic toward the"nullity wish" because I, myself, have experienced it as well very strongly, though I am a (sexually) happily married man.

I would like to assist some of the participants in this forum by explaining briefly that physicians are reluctant to approve/assist/participate in nullification primarily because of their fear of their licensing/certification boards which basically also MUST

disapprove of/sanction doctors for the removal of a physically healthy organ! It is THAT simple. The doctors are not worried about being sued, nor are most so rigid as to be stolidly incapable of realizing how vast are the boundaries of human craving.

Doctors are the most scared people on earth. Regardless of what their personal sympathies may be, requisite "professionalism" prevents their open empathy with such causes or they think it would. They as a group can envision the licensing authorities in America swooping down upon them to deprive them of their livelihood if they coöperate or even offer succour. A charge of unprofessionalism before a licensing authority in the United States is pursued by the board as eagerly as if they were the prosecutors: the truth is that they are not only the final judges, but also that they represent the chief prosecutorial impetus. This obvious conflict of interest and rôle is tolerated in "administrative" law of which licensing is a part here in America. Our safeguards as to conflict of interest only apply to the civil & criminal cases. This is a defect in our system which is extremely unlikely to be addressed in anything like the near future.

So, it is not their morality or their fear of malpractice suits that prevents most physicians from helping/supporting OUR causes or concerns, but the simple, common cowardice related to not wishing to take up someone else's cudgel. They feel just going through medical school didn't commit them to solving all the world's problems.

Mac (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2002 5:28 am Will that attitude change with the advent of more women doctors? Will they be more willing

john012033 (imported) wrote: Sun Apr 02, 2006 12:18 pm to remove a man's penis and testicles?

I'm a physician. I am empathic toward the"nullity wish" because I, myself, have experienced it as well very strongly, though I am a (sexually) happily married man.

I would like to assist some of the participants in this forum by explaining briefly that physicians are reluctant to approve/assist/participate in nullification primarily because of their fear of their licensing/certification boards which basically also MUST disapprove of/sanction doctors for the removal

of a physically healthy organ! It is THAT simple. ......Then what can one do to make nullification necessary so that a licensed urologist will willingly remove those things and reroute the urethra?

I guess the real answer to this, is not having healthy organs so they can be removed.

Old thread from 2002.

Closed.