MacTheWolf (imported) wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:16 am Obviously these laws were created by IDIOTS.

If I had a newborn baby and my wife was giving it its first bath, and I took photos of it, I would be guilty of a crime?

s-t-u-p-i-d

There is such a huge difference between what your talking about and kiddie porn. I would be astonished if anyone in Law Enforcement were to spent a 1/10 of a second getting worked up about a parents Baby pictures.

mrt (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:19 am There is such a huge difference between what your talking about and kiddie porn. I would be astonished if anyone in Law Enforcement were to spent a 1/10 of a second getting worked up about a parents Baby pictures.

Then prepare to be astonished! A good friend of mine told me this, and I do accept it as the truth. His wife is Korean, and they have ties to the Asian community. One of their Korean friends was arrested, albeit the charges were not prosecuted, for receiving kiddy porn in the U.S. mail. In the Korean culture, the birth of a son is a good cause for celebration, and proud parents often send a photo of the newborn baby boy (the photo showing a nude baby BOY) to their parents if they are not living close by. The joyous Korean grandparents, were arrested by U.S. postal inspectors...

Too many "law enforcement" types are just STUPID idiots looking to raise their felony arrest count. It amazes me how most "cops" love to brag about all the big time criminals they bust. I am sure that some "Barney Fife" sort of postal inspector is bragging about how their tireless investigation busted the infamous "Korean Kiddy Porn Connection."

Over the years, I have changed my opinioin of law enforcement quite a bit. Twentyfive years ago, I was a devout "law and order" type, and actually I still am very conscientious about obeying the law, but now I have very little respect for most cops.

mrt (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:19 am There is such a huge difference between what your talking about and kiddie porn. I would be astonished if anyone in Law Enforcement were to spent a 1/10 of a second getting worked up about a parents Baby pictures.

This has happened in the state where you live. The way the law is written there is no room for the exercise of judgment by law enforcement officers. Most complaints are brought by employees at photo developing shops. Some police departments even have workshops for photo employees to get them to report customers. --FLO--

Uncle Flo (imported) wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:55 am In the U.S. the child porn statutes forbid the taking or possession of nude photos of any child by any person (including parents). There are exceptions for medical purposes and cases of "artistic merit". Artistic merit cases usually end up being decided by a judge. The law is draconian in its scope as most reasonable defences are specifically not allowed. This only applies to photos not to drawings or paintings. Computer produced images are usually allowed but there have been unsuccessful attempts at prosecution. --FLO--

Who is the great photographer who photographed her daughters? She later photographed decaying human bodies.

There is some kind of subplot to all these laws, but I am not smart enough to read it.

Uncle Flo

Do you have any bath pix of an 18 or 19 year old Daughter you could send me? - heh heh

Mac: the perverse wolf.

MacTheWolf (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:23 pm Uncle Flo

Do you have any bath pix of an 18 or 19 year old Daughter you could send me? - heh heh

Mac: the perverse wolf.

Mac,

Daughter is 21, isn't she?

Daughter is 26 and looks wonderful. I was 26 once..back in 1972.

MacTheWolf (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:02 pm Daughter is 26 and looks wonderful. I was 26 once..back in 1972.

I was 26 back in the sixties!

Blaise (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:58 pm I was 26 back in the sixties!

Damn, somebody else is actually older than me. We should form a club of Old Geezers... River, Blaise, me. sag and Jesus

Blaise (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:58 pm I was 26 back in the sixties!

Or was that 66 back in the twenties? (HeHe) --FLO--