samuelcoral (imported) wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2010 3:28 pm My personal reason for wanting castration is my HUGE panty fetish, and with no testicles in the way my panties would fit and look better!

My wife thought panties were appropriate for me after I had a vasectomy. I wasn't totally sure if she was joking or serious but it seemed harmless enough to try. While it might have been embarrassing if others knew about them, they were hiddden so it was mostly our secret. It did seem rather kinky and didn't take long before I was comfortable putting on panties every morning. They fit OK because my parts were pretty compact. They do fit even better now as the removal of the balls and shrinkage of my penis don't take up space anymore.

BTW the last time I had any male type underwear on was when I came out of my surgery. In the OR, they put an ordinary jock on me stuffed with a wad of gauze to soak up any leakages or oozings. It was replaced quickly when we got home with an ordinary feminine pad and a women's control brief to hold it in place.

Do you fell better in panties compaired to male underwear

chemcast scot (imported) wrote: Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:44 am Do you fell better in panties compaired to male underwear

Yes I do, panties are so much cuter and softer and all around better than boys underwear.

I have been wearing panties 24/7 since I was 16.

It is hard to answer if you will have ability to orgasm after castration. Some people have and some do not. It seem to be very personal.

I wounder if those eunuchs who are able to orgasm now, were able to have orgasms before puberty too. Or if there was no orgasms before puberty then there was no orgasms after castration? Any experience?

I read a study once of men who were castrated for medical reasons. First, it was amazing how fast their blood testosterone dropped- they were at castrate level in 3-4 hours after surgery. The second point was that something like 15% of those who were under 60 when castrated were capable of ordinary intercourse. I wish I could remember where I saw that.

Is that not the first sign of old age when you start to emm what was i saying lol

saywhat (imported) wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:51 pm One question that I have about orgasms since I am still relatively new at this. For those of you who supplement your sex hormone with E, are you able to have multiple orgasms? Even with low T I can only still go once. Just wondering if the E rewires the brain for multiple orgasms.

I can enjoy multiple orgasms if I like; though I could do that before orchification. It's definitely more common for me now. Dunno.

My significant other, wears tight underwear and has erections every single night. Lucky him.. I never have erections.. I am old and worn out.

Question for those that are castrated and still getting erections and orgasms, are you taking any hormone replacement or testosterone?

My understanding is as others have mentioned, it is possible to get erections and stilll orgasm after castration, but it is a hit or miss. Also the ability may deminish after a long period. Some do and some are unable. Is this correct from those experienced with it?

C van D (imported) wrote: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:42 am I may have contributed to this uncertainty with the "Simon" stories. Neither Simon nor any of his friends is capable of penetrative sex. The description of the American boy Jason in "Simon and the Professsional" says, of his private area, that it is "a smooth little knob, like a sea anemone, drawn in right up to the glans".

Jason was emasculated with Neutersol which (a) destroys a boy's testicles (b) destroys his erectile nerves (c) induces 'penile shrinkage'.

OK so far - but as my friend and superior officer Paolo has stressed many times, although there is a drug called Neutersol, it is not licenced to be used - nor ever has been - on humans, and my graphic descriptions of its results are all in the interests of telling a good story.

Ironically, neutersol isn't nearly that intense - we should assume the fictional version is more powerful because it's been refined for a while. In the real world, neutersol is popular because it's cheap and easy for mass-sterilization projects in poor communities, or trap-neuter-release programs. Its training requirements mean it's seen as something of a premium product in America, since it's a very exclusive club of trained vets so far, and the company won't sell you the drug until you're trained, and will stop providing to you if you allow an untrained practitioner (such as a nurse) if you allow them to administer the drug. It's avoiding a reputation for botched injections, but at no small cost.

Normally, neutersol works a lot like the homebrew CaCl-in-ethanol ("Calchlorin") favored on the chemical castration forum, resulting in a relatively rapid onset of sterilization…LINK TO A BANNED SITE WAS POSTED!but calchlorin, ironically, has a stronger effect. Neutersol - now sold as Zeuterin and Esterilsol in spanish-speaking markets - causes reliable sterilization…LINK TO A BANNED SITE WAS POSTED!I'll just quote the paper: (http://library.constantcontact.com/down ... rilsol.pdf)

In the clinical trial results presented to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), this formulation was found to cause permanent sterility in 99.6% of treated dogs. Pre-pubescent males never become fertile. Post-pubescent males become infertile in less than 30 days after treatment.

In the concentration used, zinc gluconate acts as a spermicide and destroys spermatozoa in all stages of development and maturation. It results in permanent and irreversible fibrosis in the seminiferous tubules, rete testis and epididymis. This produces a reduction in the size and texture of the testicles and permanent sterilization. Testosterone production is reduced by [only] 41-52%, and the endocrine feedback system remains intact. Zinc gluconate is absorbed and metabolized by the body within 72 hours after the injection.

Esterilsol does not reduce testosterone to the same concentration as surgical castration does, and its effects on hormone-dependent diseases and behaviors have not been established. A lesser impact on testosterone production is considered a drawback by some pet owners who seek reproductive behavioral changes commonly associated with surgical castration. However, other pet owners prefer a limited impact on testosterone, citing health and behavior risks associated with surgical castration. It is important to note that testosterone levels range widely among dogs.

As to the bolded section in the quote (my emphasis) - someone here mixed up a batch and tried it, after years of untreated, severe testicle pain. I haven't the sense to bookmark it, but it bought him a good week (his theory - it stunned the nerves), and then a surgical orchiectomy when he landed in the ER; the DIY attempt drove home the degree of suffering and desperation, and he was given surgery, and as far as I know, he lived happily ever after. That said, I don't know of anybody trying the real McCoy commercial preparation.